cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining frequency updates
The original comment about the frequency increase to maximum is wrong. Both increase and decrease happen at steps. Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
00bfe05889
commit
42d951c851
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ static inline unsigned int get_freq_step(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
|
|||
* sampling_down_factor, we check, if current idle time is more than 80%
|
||||
* (default), then we try to decrease frequency
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency. Frequency reduction
|
||||
* happens at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum frequency
|
||||
* Frequency updates happen at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum
|
||||
* frequency
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue