Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

workqueue: note the nested NOT_RUNNING test in worker_clr_flags() isn't a noop

Browse source 
The nested NOT_RUNNING test in worker_clr_flags() is slightly
misleading in that if NOT_RUNNING were a single flag the nested test
would be always %true and thus noop.  Add a comment noting that the
test isn't a noop.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Tejun Heo 2011-01-11 15:58:49 +01:00
parent e159489baa
commit 42c025f3de
1 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
kernel/workqueue.c
View file

@ -768,7 +768,11 @@ static inline void worker_clr_flags(struct worker *worker, unsigned int flags)
worker->flags &= ~flags;
/* if transitioning out of NOT_RUNNING, increment nr_running */
/*
* If transitioning out of NOT_RUNNING, increment nr_running. Note
* that the nested NOT_RUNNING is not a noop. NOT_RUNNING is mask
* of multiple flags, not a single flag.
*/
if ((flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING) && (oflags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING))
if (!(worker->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING))
atomic_inc(get_gcwq_nr_running(gcwq->cpu));