From 419d4741ce108a56ce59e9dc064730af59b7e843 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Borislav Petkov <bbpetkov@yahoo.de>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 19:56:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ide-tape: make function name more accurate
idetape_active_next_stage() was rather ambiguous wrt its purpose. Make that
more explicit and remove superfluous comment.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bbpetkov@yahoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
---
drivers/ide/ide-tape.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
index 2d4d28271101..8b9da8bb5cce 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
@@ -846,10 +846,7 @@ static void idetape_analyze_error(ide_drive_t *drive, u8 *sense)
}
}
-/*
- * idetape_active_next_stage will declare the next stage as "active".
- */
-static void idetape_active_next_stage (ide_drive_t *drive)
+static void idetape_activate_next_stage(ide_drive_t *drive)
{
idetape_tape_t *tape = drive->driver_data;
idetape_stage_t *stage = tape->next_stage;
@@ -1040,7 +1037,7 @@ static int idetape_end_request(ide_drive_t *drive, int uptodate, int nr_sects)
}
}
if (tape->next_stage != NULL) {
- idetape_active_next_stage(drive);
+ idetape_activate_next_stage(drive);
/*
* Insert the next request into the request queue.
@@ -2414,7 +2411,7 @@ static void idetape_insert_pipeline_into_queue (ide_drive_t *drive)
return;
if (!idetape_pipeline_active(tape)) {
set_bit(IDETAPE_PIPELINE_ACTIVE, &tape->flags);
- idetape_active_next_stage(drive);
+ idetape_activate_next_stage(drive);
(void) ide_do_drive_cmd(drive, tape->active_data_request, ide_end);
}
}