[NET]: Make illegal_highdma more anal
Rather than having illegal_highdma as a macro when HIGHMEM is off, we can turn it into an inline function that returns zero. This will catch callers that give it bad arguments. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
47da8ee681
commit
3d3a853379
1 changed files with 2 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -1239,7 +1239,6 @@ void netdev_rx_csum_fault(struct net_device *dev)
|
||||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_rx_csum_fault);
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_rx_csum_fault);
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
|
|
||||||
/* Actually, we should eliminate this check as soon as we know, that:
|
/* Actually, we should eliminate this check as soon as we know, that:
|
||||||
* 1. IOMMU is present and allows to map all the memory.
|
* 1. IOMMU is present and allows to map all the memory.
|
||||||
* 2. No high memory really exists on this machine.
|
* 2. No high memory really exists on this machine.
|
||||||
|
@ -1247,6 +1246,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_rx_csum_fault);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static inline int illegal_highdma(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
static inline int illegal_highdma(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
|
||||||
int i;
|
int i;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (dev->features & NETIF_F_HIGHDMA)
|
if (dev->features & NETIF_F_HIGHDMA)
|
||||||
|
@ -1256,11 +1256,9 @@ static inline int illegal_highdma(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||||
if (PageHighMem(skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i].page))
|
if (PageHighMem(skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i].page))
|
||||||
return 1;
|
return 1;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#endif
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
#else
|
|
||||||
#define illegal_highdma(dev, skb) (0)
|
|
||||||
#endif
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
struct dev_gso_cb {
|
struct dev_gso_cb {
|
||||||
void (*destructor)(struct sk_buff *skb);
|
void (*destructor)(struct sk_buff *skb);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue