fs/drop_caches.c: avoid softlockups in drop_pagecache_sb()
[ Upstream commit c27d82f52f75fc9d8d9d40d120d2a96fdeeada5e ] When superblock has lots of inodes without any pagecache (like is the case for /proc), drop_pagecache_sb() will iterate through all of them without dropping sb->s_inode_list_lock which can lead to softlockups (one of our customers hit this). Fix the problem by going to the slow path and doing cond_resched() in case the process needs rescheduling. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190114085343.15011-1-jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f1524fd049
commit
3d0acc076f
1 changed files with 7 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -21,8 +21,13 @@ static void drop_pagecache_sb(struct super_block *sb, void *unused)
|
|||
spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(inode, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We must skip inodes in unusual state. We may also skip
|
||||
* inodes without pages but we deliberately won't in case
|
||||
* we need to reschedule to avoid softlockups.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE|I_NEW)) ||
|
||||
(inode->i_mapping->nrpages == 0)) {
|
||||
(inode->i_mapping->nrpages == 0 && !need_resched())) {
|
||||
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -30,6 +35,7 @@ static void drop_pagecache_sb(struct super_block *sb, void *unused)
|
|||
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
invalidate_mapping_pages(inode->i_mapping, 0, -1);
|
||||
iput(toput_inode);
|
||||
toput_inode = inode;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue