crypto: sha512 - Avoid stack bloat on i386
Unfortunately in reducing W from 80 to 16 we ended up unrolling the loop twice. As gcc has issues dealing with 64-bit ops on i386 this means that we end up using even more stack space (>1K). This patch solves the W reduction by moving LOAD_OP/BLEND_OP into the loop itself, thus avoiding the need to duplicate it. While the stack space still isn't great (>0.5K) it is at least in the same ball park as the amount of stack used for our C sha1 implementation. Note that this patch basically reverts to the original code so the diff looks bigger than it really is. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
58d7d18b52
commit
3a92d687c8
1 changed files with 30 additions and 34 deletions
|
@ -89,46 +89,42 @@ sha512_transform(u64 *state, const u8 *input)
|
|||
int i;
|
||||
u64 W[16];
|
||||
|
||||
/* load the input */
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
|
||||
LOAD_OP(i, W, input);
|
||||
|
||||
/* load the state into our registers */
|
||||
a=state[0]; b=state[1]; c=state[2]; d=state[3];
|
||||
e=state[4]; f=state[5]; g=state[6]; h=state[7];
|
||||
|
||||
#define SHA512_0_15(i, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h) \
|
||||
t1 = h + e1(e) + Ch(e, f, g) + sha512_K[i] + W[i]; \
|
||||
t2 = e0(a) + Maj(a, b, c); \
|
||||
d += t1; \
|
||||
h = t1 + t2
|
||||
/* now iterate */
|
||||
for (i=0; i<80; i+=8) {
|
||||
if (!(i & 8)) {
|
||||
int j;
|
||||
|
||||
#define SHA512_16_79(i, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h) \
|
||||
BLEND_OP(i, W); \
|
||||
t1 = h + e1(e) + Ch(e, f, g) + sha512_K[i] + W[(i)&15]; \
|
||||
t2 = e0(a) + Maj(a, b, c); \
|
||||
d += t1; \
|
||||
h = t1 + t2
|
||||
if (i < 16) {
|
||||
/* load the input */
|
||||
for (j = 0; j < 16; j++)
|
||||
LOAD_OP(i + j, W, input);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
for (j = 0; j < 16; j++) {
|
||||
BLEND_OP(i + j, W);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < 16; i += 8) {
|
||||
SHA512_0_15(i, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h);
|
||||
SHA512_0_15(i + 1, h, a, b, c, d, e, f, g);
|
||||
SHA512_0_15(i + 2, g, h, a, b, c, d, e, f);
|
||||
SHA512_0_15(i + 3, f, g, h, a, b, c, d, e);
|
||||
SHA512_0_15(i + 4, e, f, g, h, a, b, c, d);
|
||||
SHA512_0_15(i + 5, d, e, f, g, h, a, b, c);
|
||||
SHA512_0_15(i + 6, c, d, e, f, g, h, a, b);
|
||||
SHA512_0_15(i + 7, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, a);
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (i = 16; i < 80; i += 8) {
|
||||
SHA512_16_79(i, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h);
|
||||
SHA512_16_79(i + 1, h, a, b, c, d, e, f, g);
|
||||
SHA512_16_79(i + 2, g, h, a, b, c, d, e, f);
|
||||
SHA512_16_79(i + 3, f, g, h, a, b, c, d, e);
|
||||
SHA512_16_79(i + 4, e, f, g, h, a, b, c, d);
|
||||
SHA512_16_79(i + 5, d, e, f, g, h, a, b, c);
|
||||
SHA512_16_79(i + 6, c, d, e, f, g, h, a, b);
|
||||
SHA512_16_79(i + 7, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, a);
|
||||
t1 = h + e1(e) + Ch(e,f,g) + sha512_K[i ] + W[(i & 15)];
|
||||
t2 = e0(a) + Maj(a,b,c); d+=t1; h=t1+t2;
|
||||
t1 = g + e1(d) + Ch(d,e,f) + sha512_K[i+1] + W[(i & 15) + 1];
|
||||
t2 = e0(h) + Maj(h,a,b); c+=t1; g=t1+t2;
|
||||
t1 = f + e1(c) + Ch(c,d,e) + sha512_K[i+2] + W[(i & 15) + 2];
|
||||
t2 = e0(g) + Maj(g,h,a); b+=t1; f=t1+t2;
|
||||
t1 = e + e1(b) + Ch(b,c,d) + sha512_K[i+3] + W[(i & 15) + 3];
|
||||
t2 = e0(f) + Maj(f,g,h); a+=t1; e=t1+t2;
|
||||
t1 = d + e1(a) + Ch(a,b,c) + sha512_K[i+4] + W[(i & 15) + 4];
|
||||
t2 = e0(e) + Maj(e,f,g); h+=t1; d=t1+t2;
|
||||
t1 = c + e1(h) + Ch(h,a,b) + sha512_K[i+5] + W[(i & 15) + 5];
|
||||
t2 = e0(d) + Maj(d,e,f); g+=t1; c=t1+t2;
|
||||
t1 = b + e1(g) + Ch(g,h,a) + sha512_K[i+6] + W[(i & 15) + 6];
|
||||
t2 = e0(c) + Maj(c,d,e); f+=t1; b=t1+t2;
|
||||
t1 = a + e1(f) + Ch(f,g,h) + sha512_K[i+7] + W[(i & 15) + 7];
|
||||
t2 = e0(b) + Maj(b,c,d); e+=t1; a=t1+t2;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
state[0] += a; state[1] += b; state[2] += c; state[3] += d;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue