mm: compaction: fix special case -1 order checks
Commit56de7263fc
("mm: compaction: direct compact when a high-order allocation fails") introduced a check for cc->order == -1 in compact_finished. We should continue compacting in that case because the request came from userspace and there is no particular order to compact for. Similar check has been added by82478fb7
(mm: compaction: prevent division-by-zero during user-requested compaction) for compaction_suitable. The check is, however, done after zone_watermark_ok which uses order as a right hand argument for shifts. Not only watermark check is pointless if we can break out without it but it also uses 1 << -1 which is not well defined (at least from C standard). Let's move the -1 check above zone_watermark_ok. [minchan.kim@gmail.com> - caught compaction_suitable] Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hioryu@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5f1a19070b
commit
3957c7768e
1 changed files with 14 additions and 14 deletions
|
@ -420,13 +420,6 @@ static int compact_finished(struct zone *zone,
|
|||
if (cc->free_pfn <= cc->migrate_pfn)
|
||||
return COMPACT_COMPLETE;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Compaction run is not finished if the watermark is not met */
|
||||
watermark = low_wmark_pages(zone);
|
||||
watermark += (1 << cc->order);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, cc->order, watermark, 0, 0))
|
||||
return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* order == -1 is expected when compacting via
|
||||
* /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
|
||||
|
@ -434,6 +427,13 @@ static int compact_finished(struct zone *zone,
|
|||
if (cc->order == -1)
|
||||
return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Compaction run is not finished if the watermark is not met */
|
||||
watermark = low_wmark_pages(zone);
|
||||
watermark += (1 << cc->order);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, cc->order, watermark, 0, 0))
|
||||
return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Direct compactor: Is a suitable page free? */
|
||||
for (order = cc->order; order < MAX_ORDER; order++) {
|
||||
/* Job done if page is free of the right migratetype */
|
||||
|
@ -460,6 +460,13 @@ unsigned long compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order)
|
|||
int fragindex;
|
||||
unsigned long watermark;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* order == -1 is expected when compacting via
|
||||
* /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (order == -1)
|
||||
return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Watermarks for order-0 must be met for compaction. Note the 2UL.
|
||||
* This is because during migration, copies of pages need to be
|
||||
|
@ -469,13 +476,6 @@ unsigned long compaction_suitable(struct zone *zone, int order)
|
|||
if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, watermark, 0, 0))
|
||||
return COMPACT_SKIPPED;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* order == -1 is expected when compacting via
|
||||
* /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (order == -1)
|
||||
return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* fragmentation index determines if allocation failures are due to
|
||||
* low memory or external fragmentation
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue