[PATCH] zfcp: fix incorrect usage of fsf_req_list_lock
================================= [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] --------------------------------- inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage. swapper/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes: (&adapter->fsf_req_list_lock){++..}, at: [<0000000000274486>] zfcp_qdio_reqid_check+0x46/0x178 {in-hardirq-W} state was registered at: [<000000000005fb0c>] __lock_acquire+0xad8/0xed0 [<00000000000604ae>] lock_acquire+0x9a/0xc8 [<000000000035a326>] _spin_lock+0x4e/0x68 [<0000000000274486>] zfcp_qdio_reqid_check+0x46/0x178 [<000000000027469e>] zfcp_qdio_response_handler+0xe6/0x430 [<0000000000219dd4>] tiqdio_thinint_handler+0xd20/0x213c [<000000000020229a>] do_adapter_IO+0xb2/0xc0 [<0000000000206f32>] do_IRQ+0x136/0x16c [<0000000000020462>] io_no_vtime+0x16/0x1c [<0000000000019432>] cpu_idle+0x222/0x250 irq event stamp: 129220 hardirqs last enabled at (129220): [<00000000000411e6>] tasklet_hi_action+0x5a/0x19c hardirqs last disabled at (129219): [<00000000000411c0>] tasklet_hi_action+0x34/0x19c softirqs last enabled at (129212): [<0000000000040b62>] __do_softirq+0x13a/0x180 softirqs last disabled at (129217): [<000000000001fd58>] do_softirq+0xec/0xf0 other info that might help us debug this: no locks held by swapper/0. stack backtrace: 00000000012bb670 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 00000000012bb780 00000000012bb6e8 0000000000399122 0000000000399122 0000000000016b0a 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000004660e8 0000000000000000 000000000000000d 00000000012bb6e0 00000000012bb758 0000000000368b90 0000000000016b0a 00000000012bb6e0 00000000012bb730 Call Trace: ([<0000000000016a26>] show_trace+0x76/0xdc) [<0000000000016b2c>] show_stack+0xa0/0xd0 [<0000000000016b8a>] dump_stack+0x2e/0x3c [<000000000005e3da>] print_usage_bug+0x27e/0x290 [<000000000005ea9c>] mark_lock+0x6b0/0x6c0 [<000000000005f33e>] __lock_acquire+0x30a/0xed0 [<00000000000604ae>] lock_acquire+0x9a/0xc8 [<000000000035a326>] _spin_lock+0x4e/0x68 [<0000000000274486>] zfcp_qdio_reqid_check+0x46/0x178 [<000000000027469e>] zfcp_qdio_response_handler+0xe6/0x430 [<0000000000217bd2>] tiqdio_tl+0xd02/0x2120 [<000000000004123a>] tasklet_hi_action+0xae/0x19c [<0000000000040ae4>] __do_softirq+0xbc/0x180 [<000000000001fd58>] do_softirq+0xec/0xf0 [<0000000000040c38>] irq_exit+0x90/0xa8 [<0000000000206f40>] do_IRQ+0x144/0x16c [<0000000000020462>] io_no_vtime+0x16/0x1c [<0000000000019432>] cpu_idle+0x222/0x250 ([<0000000000019416>] cpu_idle+0x206/0x250) [<000000000001405a>] rest_init+0x5a/0x68 [<0000000000536998>] start_kernel+0x39c/0x3dc [<0000000000013046>] _stext+0x46/0x1000 Fix incorrect usage of fsf_req_list_lock. It's used in tasklet context (irqs on) as well as in irq context. Therefore use the spin_lock_irqsave variant to avoid deadlocks. Acked-by: Andreas Herrmann <aherrman@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9f09c548e1
commit
38c54ee8d5
1 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ int
|
|||
zfcp_qdio_reqid_check(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter, void *sbale_addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf_req;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
|
||||
/* invalid (per convention used in this driver) */
|
||||
if (unlikely(!sbale_addr)) {
|
||||
|
@ -438,15 +439,15 @@ zfcp_qdio_reqid_check(struct zfcp_adapter *adapter, void *sbale_addr)
|
|||
fsf_req = (struct zfcp_fsf_req *) sbale_addr;
|
||||
|
||||
/* serialize with zfcp_fsf_req_dismiss_all */
|
||||
spin_lock(&adapter->fsf_req_list_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->fsf_req_list_lock, flags);
|
||||
if (list_empty(&adapter->fsf_req_list_head)) {
|
||||
spin_unlock(&adapter->fsf_req_list_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->fsf_req_list_lock, flags);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
list_del(&fsf_req->list);
|
||||
atomic_dec(&adapter->fsf_reqs_active);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&adapter->fsf_req_list_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->fsf_req_list_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(adapter != fsf_req->adapter)) {
|
||||
ZFCP_LOG_NORMAL("bug: invalid reqid (fsf_req=%p, "
|
||||
"fsf_req->adapter=%p, adapter=%p)\n",
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue