Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

perf/x86/intel: Use rdmsrl_safe() when initializing RAPL PMU

Browse source 
CPUs which should support the RAPL counters according to
Family/Model/Stepping may still issue #GP when attempting to access
the RAPL MSRs. This may happen when Linux is running under KVM and
we are passing-through host F/M/S data, for example. Use rdmsrl_safe
to first access the RAPL_POWER_UNIT MSR; if this fails, do not
attempt to use this PMU.

Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394739386-22260-1-git-send-email-venkateshs@google.com
Cc: zheng.z.yan@intel.com
Cc: eranian@google.com
Cc: ak@linux.intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
[ The patch also silently fixes another bug: rapl_pmu_init() didn't handle the memory alloc failure case previously. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Venkatesh Srinivas 2014-03-13 12:36:26 -07:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 6381c24cd6
commit 2422365780
1 changed files with 9 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
View file

@ -535,6 +535,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_prepare(int cpu)
struct rapl_pmu *pmu = per_cpu(rapl_pmu, cpu);
int phys_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
u64 ms;
u64 msr_rapl_power_unit_bits;
if (pmu)
return 0;
@ -542,6 +543,9 @@ static int rapl_cpu_prepare(int cpu)
if (phys_id < 0)
return -1;
if (!rdmsrl_safe(MSR_RAPL_POWER_UNIT, &msr_rapl_power_unit_bits))
return -1;
pmu = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*pmu), GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
if (!pmu)
return -1;
@ -555,8 +559,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_prepare(int cpu)
*
* we cache in local PMU instance
*/
rdmsrl(MSR_RAPL_POWER_UNIT, pmu->hw_unit);
pmu->hw_unit = (pmu->hw_unit >> 8) & 0x1FULL;
pmu->hw_unit = (msr_rapl_power_unit_bits >> 8) & 0x1FULL;
pmu->pmu = &rapl_pmu_class;
/*
@ -677,7 +680,9 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
rapl_cpu_prepare(cpu);
ret = rapl_cpu_prepare(cpu);
if (ret)
goto out;
rapl_cpu_init(cpu);
}
@ -700,6 +705,7 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
hweight32(rapl_cntr_mask),
ktime_to_ms(pmu->timer_interval));
out:
cpu_notifier_register_done();
return 0;