Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

pinctrl: make the pinmux-pins more helpful

Browse source 
The debugfs file pinmux-pins used to tell which function was
enabled but now states simply which device owns the pin. Being
owned by the pinctrl driver itself means just that it's hogged
so be a bit more helpful by printing that.

ChangeLog v1->v2:
- Preserve the self-referential owner field, just clarify that
  when the pin controller states itself as owner this means
  that it's hogged.

Acked-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Linus Walleij 2012-02-24 06:53:04 +01:00
parent 2304b4737f
commit 1cf94c45ca
1 changed files with 8 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

11
drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
View file

@ -626,8 +626,8 @@ static int pinmux_pins_show(struct seq_file *s, void *what)
/* The pin number can be retrived from the pin controller descriptor */
for (i = 0; i < pctldev->desc->npins; i++) {
struct pin_desc *desc;
bool is_hog = false;
pin = pctldev->desc->pins[i].number;
desc = pin_desc_get(pctldev, pin);
@ -635,9 +635,14 @@ static int pinmux_pins_show(struct seq_file *s, void *what)
if (desc == NULL)
continue;
seq_printf(s, "pin %d (%s): %s\n", pin,
if (desc->owner &&
!strcmp(desc->owner, pinctrl_dev_get_name(pctldev)))
is_hog = true;
seq_printf(s, "pin %d (%s): %s%s\n", pin,
desc->name ? desc->name : "unnamed",
desc->owner ? desc->owner : "UNCLAIMED");
desc->owner ? desc->owner : "UNCLAIMED",
is_hog ? " (HOG)" : "");
}
return 0;