From 1c34092adf1feaba25b7c739cc4def2751f4fa05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:22:07 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] nfs: lock() vs unlock() typo
These should be spin_unlock() instead of spin_lock(). It's a typo.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/nfs/namespace.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/namespace.c b/fs/nfs/namespace.c
index c0b8344db0c6..bf1c68009ffd 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/namespace.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ char *nfs_path(char **p, struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, ssize_t buflen)
namelen--;
buflen -= namelen;
if (buflen < 0) {
- spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
goto Elong;
}
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ char *nfs_path(char **p, struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, ssize_t buflen)
rcu_read_unlock();
return end;
Elong_unlock:
- spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
if (read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))
goto rename_retry;