audit: drop audit_cmd_lock in AUDIT_USER family of cases
We do not need to hold the audit_cmd_mutex for this family of cases. The possible exception to this is the call to audit_filter_user(), so drop the lock immediately after. To help in fixing the race we are trying to avoid, make sure that nothing called by audit_filter_user() calls audit_log_start(). In particular, watch out for *_audit_rule_match(). This fix will take care of systemd and anything USING audit. It still means that we could race with something configuring audit and auditd shutting down. Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> Reported-by: toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com Tested-by: toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4eb0f4abfb
commit
1b7b533f65
1 changed files with 2 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -876,6 +876,7 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
|
|||
if (err)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&audit_cmd_mutex);
|
||||
audit_log_common_recv_msg(&ab, msg_type);
|
||||
if (msg_type != AUDIT_USER_TTY)
|
||||
audit_log_format(ab, " msg='%.*s'",
|
||||
|
@ -893,6 +894,7 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
|
|||
}
|
||||
audit_set_portid(ab, NETLINK_CB(skb).portid);
|
||||
audit_log_end(ab);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&audit_cmd_mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case AUDIT_ADD_RULE:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue