From 1a75972c61f2c224eb5283c183f9f6b17fb09b6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:39:58 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ifb: use netif_receive_skb() instead of netif_rx()
In ri_tasklet(), we run from softirq, so can directly handle packet
through netif_receive_skb() instead of netif_rx().
There is no risk of recursion.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
drivers/net/ifb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ifb.c b/drivers/net/ifb.c
index 8bcacd7c7715..124dac4532b2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ifb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ifb.c
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static void ri_tasklet(unsigned long dev)
dev_queue_xmit(skb);
} else if (from & AT_INGRESS) {
skb_pull(skb, skb->dev->hard_header_len);
- netif_rx(skb);
+ netif_receive_skb(skb);
} else
BUG();
}