From ded4926aa28992efcb67dd27a642ddf139ac572b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Corbet Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:19:56 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 1/9] Add the seq_file documentation This is an updated version of the document describing the seq_file interface. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX | 2 + Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.txt | 283 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 285 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.txt diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX b/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX index e68021c08fbd..e731196410b3 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX @@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ relay.txt - info on relay, for efficient streaming from kernel to user space. romfs.txt - description of the ROMFS filesystem. +seq_file.txt + - how to use the seq_file API sharedsubtree.txt - a description of shared subtrees for namespaces. smbfs.txt diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..92975ee7942c --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.txt @@ -0,0 +1,283 @@ +The seq_file interface + + Copyright 2003 Jonathan Corbet + This file is originally from the LWN.net Driver Porting series at + http://lwn.net/Articles/driver-porting/ + + +There are numerous ways for a device driver (or other kernel component) to +provide information to the user or system administrator. One useful +technique is the creation of virtual files, in debugfs, /proc or elsewhere. +Virtual files can provide human-readable output that is easy to get at +without any special utility programs; they can also make life easier for +script writers. It is not surprising that the use of virtual files has +grown over the years. + +Creating those files correctly has always been a bit of a challenge, +however. It is not that hard to make a virtual file which returns a +string. But life gets trickier if the output is long - anything greater +than an application is likely to read in a single operation. Handling +multiple reads (and seeks) requires careful attention to the reader's +position within the virtual file - that position is, likely as not, in the +middle of a line of output. The kernel has traditionally had a number of +implementations that got this wrong. + +The 2.6 kernel contains a set of functions (implemented by Alexander Viro) +which are designed to make it easy for virtual file creators to get it +right. + +The seq_file interface is available via . There are +three aspects to seq_file: + + * An iterator interface which lets a virtual file implementation + step through the objects it is presenting. + + * Some utility functions for formatting objects for output without + needing to worry about things like output buffers. + + * A set of canned file_operations which implement most operations on + the virtual file. + +We'll look at the seq_file interface via an extremely simple example: a +loadable module which creates a file called /proc/sequence. The file, when +read, simply produces a set of increasing integer values, one per line. The +sequence will continue until the user loses patience and finds something +better to do. The file is seekable, in that one can do something like the +following: + + dd if=/proc/sequence of=out1 count=1 + dd if=/proc/sequence skip=1 out=out2 count=1 + +Then concatenate the output files out1 and out2 and get the right +result. Yes, it is a thoroughly useless module, but the point is to show +how the mechanism works without getting lost in other details. (Those +wanting to see the full source for this module can find it at +http://lwn.net/Articles/22359/). + + +The iterator interface + +Modules implementing a virtual file with seq_file must implement a simple +iterator object that allows stepping through the data of interest. +Iterators must be able to move to a specific position - like the file they +implement - but the interpretation of that position is up to the iterator +itself. A seq_file implementation that is formatting firewall rules, for +example, could interpret position N as the Nth rule in the chain. +Positioning can thus be done in whatever way makes the most sense for the +generator of the data, which need not be aware of how a position translates +to an offset in the virtual file. The one obvious exception is that a +position of zero should indicate the beginning of the file. + +The /proc/sequence iterator just uses the count of the next number it +will output as its position. + +Four functions must be implemented to make the iterator work. The first, +called start() takes a position as an argument and returns an iterator +which will start reading at that position. For our simple sequence example, +the start() function looks like: + + static void *ct_seq_start(struct seq_file *s, loff_t *pos) + { + loff_t *spos = kmalloc(sizeof(loff_t), GFP_KERNEL); + if (! spos) + return NULL; + *spos = *pos; + return spos; + } + +The entire data structure for this iterator is a single loff_t value +holding the current position. There is no upper bound for the sequence +iterator, but that will not be the case for most other seq_file +implementations; in most cases the start() function should check for a +"past end of file" condition and return NULL if need be. + +For more complicated applications, the private field of the seq_file +structure can be used. There is also a special value whch can be returned +by the start() function called SEQ_START_TOKEN; it can be used if you wish +to instruct your show() function (described below) to print a header at the +top of the output. SEQ_START_TOKEN should only be used if the offset is +zero, however. + +The next function to implement is called, amazingly, next(); its job is to +move the iterator forward to the next position in the sequence. The +example module can simply increment the position by one; more useful +modules will do what is needed to step through some data structure. The +next() function returns a new iterator, or NULL if the sequence is +complete. Here's the example version: + + static void *ct_seq_next(struct seq_file *s, void *v, loff_t *pos) + { + loff_t *spos = (loff_t *) v; + *pos = ++(*spos); + return spos; + } + +The stop() function is called when iteration is complete; its job, of +course, is to clean up. If dynamic memory is allocated for the iterator, +stop() is the place to free it. + + static void ct_seq_stop(struct seq_file *s, void *v) + { + kfree(v); + } + +Finally, the show() function should format the object currently pointed to +by the iterator for output. It should return zero, or an error code if +something goes wrong. The example module's show() function is: + + static int ct_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v) + { + loff_t *spos = (loff_t *) v; + seq_printf(s, "%Ld\n", *spos); + return 0; + } + +We will look at seq_printf() in a moment. But first, the definition of the +seq_file iterator is finished by creating a seq_operations structure with +the four functions we have just defined: + + static struct seq_operations ct_seq_ops = { + .start = ct_seq_start, + .next = ct_seq_next, + .stop = ct_seq_stop, + .show = ct_seq_show + }; + +This structure will be needed to tie our iterator to the /proc file in +a little bit. + +It's worth noting that the interator value returned by start() and +manipulated by the other functions is considered to be completely opaque by +the seq_file code. It can thus be anything that is useful in stepping +through the data to be output. Counters can be useful, but it could also be +a direct pointer into an array or linked list. Anything goes, as long as +the programmer is aware that things can happen between calls to the +iterator function. However, the seq_file code (by design) will not sleep +between the calls to start() and stop(), so holding a lock during that time +is a reasonable thing to do. The seq_file code will also avoid taking any +other locks while the iterator is active. + + +Formatted output + +The seq_file code manages positioning within the output created by the +iterator and getting it into the user's buffer. But, for that to work, that +output must be passed to the seq_file code. Some utility functions have +been defined which make this task easy. + +Most code will simply use seq_printf(), which works pretty much like +printk(), but which requires the seq_file pointer as an argument. It is +common to ignore the return value from seq_printf(), but a function +producing complicated output may want to check that value and quit if +something non-zero is returned; an error return means that the seq_file +buffer has been filled and further output will be discarded. + +For straight character output, the following functions may be used: + + int seq_putc(struct seq_file *m, char c); + int seq_puts(struct seq_file *m, const char *s); + int seq_escape(struct seq_file *m, const char *s, const char *esc); + +The first two output a single character and a string, just like one would +expect. seq_escape() is like seq_puts(), except that any character in s +which is in the string esc will be represented in octal form in the output. + +There is also a function for printing filenames: + + int seq_path(struct seq_file *m, struct path *path, char *esc); + +Here, path indicates the file of interest, and esc is a set of characters +which should be escaped in the output. + + +Making it all work + +So far, we have a nice set of functions which can produce output within the +seq_file system, but we have not yet turned them into a file that a user +can see. Creating a file within the kernel requires, of course, the +creation of a set of file_operations which implement the operations on that +file. The seq_file interface provides a set of canned operations which do +most of the work. The virtual file author still must implement the open() +method, however, to hook everything up. The open function is often a single +line, as in the example module: + + static int ct_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) + { + return seq_open(file, &ct_seq_ops); + }; + +Here, the call to seq_open() takes the seq_operations structure we created +before, and gets set up to iterate through the virtual file. + +On a successful open, seq_open() stores the struct seq_file pointer in +file->private_data. If you have an application where the same iterator can +be used for more than one file, you can store an arbitrary pointer in the +private field of the seq_file structure; that value can then be retrieved +by the iterator functions. + +The other operations of interest - read(), llseek(), and release() - are +all implemented by the seq_file code itself. So a virtual file's +file_operations structure will look like: + + static struct file_operations ct_file_ops = { + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .open = ct_open, + .read = seq_read, + .llseek = seq_lseek, + .release = seq_release + }; + +There is also a seq_release_private() which passes the contents of the +seq_file private field to kfree() before releasing the structure. + +The final step is the creation of the /proc file itself. In the example +code, that is done in the initialization code in the usual way: + + static int ct_init(void) + { + struct proc_dir_entry *entry; + + entry = create_proc_entry("sequence", 0, NULL); + if (entry) + entry->proc_fops = &ct_file_ops; + return 0; + } + + module_init(ct_init); + +And that is pretty much it. + + +seq_list + +If your file will be iterating through a linked list, you may find these +routines useful: + + struct list_head *seq_list_start(struct list_head *head, + loff_t pos); + struct list_head *seq_list_start_head(struct list_head *head, + loff_t pos); + struct list_head *seq_list_next(void *v, struct list_head *head, + loff_t *ppos); + +These helpers will interpret pos as a position within the list and iterate +accordingly. Your start() and next() functions need only invoke the +seq_list_* helpers with a pointer to the appropriate list_head structure. + + +The extra-simple version + +For extremely simple virtual files, there is an even easier interface. A +module can define only the show() function, which should create all the +output that the virtual file will contain. The file's open() method then +calls: + + int single_open(struct file *file, + int (*show)(struct seq_file *m, void *p), + void *data); + +When output time comes, the show() function will be called once. The data +value given to single_open() can be found in the private field of the +seq_file structure. When using single_open(), the programmer should use +single_release() instead of seq_release() in the file_operations structure +to avoid a memory leak. From ef40203a09823bc2c69168ffa626c46365e3ca2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Corbet Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:22:38 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 2/9] Fill out information on patch tags in SubmittingPatches Add more information about the various patch tags in use, and try to establish a meaning for Reviewed-by: Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches index 08a1ed1cb5d8..cc00c8e8f040 100644 --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ now, but you can do this to mark internal company procedures or just point out some special detail about the sign-off. -13) When to use Acked-by: +13) When to use Acked-by: and Cc: The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path. @@ -349,11 +349,59 @@ Acked-by: does not necessarily indicate acknowledgement of the entire patch. For example, if a patch affects multiple subsystems and has an Acked-by: from one subsystem maintainer then this usually indicates acknowledgement of just the part which affects that maintainer's code. Judgement should be used here. - When in doubt people should refer to the original discussion in the mailing +When in doubt people should refer to the original discussion in the mailing list archives. +If a person has had the opportunity to comment on a patch, but has not +provided such comments, you may optionally add a "Cc:" tag to the patch. +This is the only tag which might be added without an explicit action by the +person it names. This tag documents that potentially interested parties +have been included in the discussion -14) The canonical patch format + +14) Using Test-by: and Reviewed-by: + +A Tested-by: tag indicates that the patch has been successfully tested (in +some environment) by the person named. This tag informs maintainers that +some testing has been performed, provides a means to locate testers for +future patches, and ensures credit for the testers. + +Reviewed-by:, instead, indicates that the patch has been reviewed and found +acceptable according to the Reviewer's Statement: + + Reviewer's statement of oversight + + By offering my Reviewed-by: tag, I state that: + + (a) I have carried out a technical review of this patch to + evaluate its appropriateness and readiness for inclusion into + the mainline kernel. + + (b) Any problems, concerns, or questions relating to the patch + have been communicated back to the submitter. I am satisfied + with the submitter's response to my comments. + + (c) While there may be things that could be improved with this + submission, I believe that it is, at this time, (1) a + worthwhile modification to the kernel, and (2) free of known + issues which would argue against its inclusion. + + (d) While I have reviewed the patch and believe it to be sound, I + do not (unless explicitly stated elsewhere) make any + warranties or guarantees that it will achieve its stated + purpose or function properly in any given situation. + +A Reviewed-by tag is a statement of opinion that the patch is an +appropriate modification of the kernel without any remaining serious +technical issues. Any interested reviewer (who has done the work) can +offer a Reviewed-by tag for a patch. This tag serves to give credit to +reviewers and to inform maintainers of the degree of review which has been +done on the patch. Reviewed-by: tags, when supplied by reviewers known to +understand the subject area and to perform thorough reviews, will normally +increase the liklihood of your patch getting into the kernel. + + +15) The canonical patch format The canonical patch subject line is: From f3271f656458063e9bb0da9ba920771ecc6f024c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Engelhardt Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:09:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/9] Fixes to the seq_file document On Friday 2008-03-28 19:20, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >commit 9756ccfda31b4c4544aa010aacf71b6672d668e8 >Date: Fri Mar 28 11:19:56 2008 -0600 > > Add the seq_file documentation patch on top: - add const qualifiers - remove void* casts - use proper specifier (%Ld is not valid) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt --- Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.txt | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.txt index 92975ee7942c..cc6cdb95b73a 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.txt +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.txt @@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ complete. Here's the example version: static void *ct_seq_next(struct seq_file *s, void *v, loff_t *pos) { - loff_t *spos = (loff_t *) v; - *pos = ++(*spos); + loff_t *spos = v; + *pos = ++*spos; return spos; } @@ -127,8 +127,8 @@ something goes wrong. The example module's show() function is: static int ct_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v) { - loff_t *spos = (loff_t *) v; - seq_printf(s, "%Ld\n", *spos); + loff_t *spos = v; + seq_printf(s, "%lld\n", (long long)*spos); return 0; } @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ We will look at seq_printf() in a moment. But first, the definition of the seq_file iterator is finished by creating a seq_operations structure with the four functions we have just defined: - static struct seq_operations ct_seq_ops = { + static const struct seq_operations ct_seq_ops = { .start = ct_seq_start, .next = ct_seq_next, .stop = ct_seq_stop, @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ line, as in the example module: static int ct_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) { return seq_open(file, &ct_seq_ops); - }; + } Here, the call to seq_open() takes the seq_operations structure we created before, and gets set up to iterate through the virtual file. @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ The other operations of interest - read(), llseek(), and release() - are all implemented by the seq_file code itself. So a virtual file's file_operations structure will look like: - static struct file_operations ct_file_ops = { + static const struct file_operations ct_file_ops = { .owner = THIS_MODULE, .open = ct_open, .read = seq_read, From b40b5162ac4e5b94d16cd9fb0a87168b1633c7dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Will Newton Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:39:17 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 4/9] Fix a typo in highres.txt A small patch for the highres timers documentation: Signed-off-by: Will newton Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- Documentation/hrtimers/highres.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/hrtimers/highres.txt b/Documentation/hrtimers/highres.txt index ce0e9a91e157..a73ecf5b4bdb 100644 --- a/Documentation/hrtimers/highres.txt +++ b/Documentation/hrtimers/highres.txt @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ System-level global event devices are used for the Linux periodic tick. Per-CPU event devices are used to provide local CPU functionality such as process accounting, profiling, and high resolution timers. -The management layer assignes one or more of the folliwing functions to a clock +The management layer assigns one or more of the following functions to a clock event device: - system global periodic tick (jiffies update) - cpu local update_process_times From dc07e721a26ec7e0adb66340f1763d220cfbbd0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 15:59:05 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 5/9] Spell out behavior of atomic_dec_and_lock() in kerneldoc A little more detail here wouldn't hurt. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- include/linux/spinlock.h | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h index 576a5f77d3bd..1129ee0a7180 100644 --- a/include/linux/spinlock.h +++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h @@ -341,6 +341,9 @@ static inline void double_spin_unlock(spinlock_t *l1, spinlock_t *l2, * atomic_dec_and_lock - lock on reaching reference count zero * @atomic: the atomic counter * @lock: the spinlock in question + * + * Decrements @atomic by 1. If the result is 0, returns true and locks + * @lock. Returns false for all other cases. */ extern int _atomic_dec_and_lock(atomic_t *atomic, spinlock_t *lock); #define atomic_dec_and_lock(atomic, lock) \ From 6ded55da6be9f186ae1022724a5881b43846c164 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 15:59:03 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 6/9] Documentation: move nfsroot.txt to filesystems/ Documentation/ is a little large, and filesystems/ seems an obvious place for this file. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- Documentation/00-INDEX | 2 -- Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX | 2 ++ Documentation/{ => filesystems}/nfsroot.txt | 0 Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 6 +++--- fs/Kconfig | 8 ++++---- net/ipv4/Kconfig | 8 ++++---- net/ipv4/ipconfig.c | 2 +- 7 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) rename Documentation/{ => filesystems}/nfsroot.txt (100%) diff --git a/Documentation/00-INDEX b/Documentation/00-INDEX index fc8e7c7d182f..08a39cdb27f2 100644 --- a/Documentation/00-INDEX +++ b/Documentation/00-INDEX @@ -271,8 +271,6 @@ netlabel/ - directory with information on the NetLabel subsystem. networking/ - directory with info on various aspects of networking with Linux. -nfsroot.txt - - short guide on setting up a diskless box with NFS root filesystem. nmi_watchdog.txt - info on NMI watchdog for SMP systems. nommu-mmap.txt diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX b/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX index e731196410b3..2ec174c992f1 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ mandatory-locking.txt - info on the Linux implementation of Sys V mandatory file locking. ncpfs.txt - info on Novell Netware(tm) filesystem using NCP protocol. +nfsroot.txt + - short guide on setting up a diskless box with NFS root filesystem. ntfs.txt - info and mount options for the NTFS filesystem (Windows NT). ocfs2.txt diff --git a/Documentation/nfsroot.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/nfsroot.txt similarity index 100% rename from Documentation/nfsroot.txt rename to Documentation/filesystems/nfsroot.txt diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt index 508e2a2c9864..57709e472b9b 100644 --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt @@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file arch/alpha/kernel/core_marvel.c. ip= [IP_PNP] - See Documentation/nfsroot.txt. + See Documentation/filesystems/nfsroot.txt. ip2= [HW] Set IO/IRQ pairs for up to 4 IntelliPort boards See comment before ip2_setup() in @@ -1199,10 +1199,10 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file file if at all. nfsaddrs= [NFS] - See Documentation/nfsroot.txt. + See Documentation/filesystems/nfsroot.txt. nfsroot= [NFS] nfs root filesystem for disk-less boxes. - See Documentation/nfsroot.txt. + See Documentation/filesystems/nfsroot.txt. nfs.callback_tcpport= [NFS] set the TCP port on which the NFSv4 callback diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig index d7312825592b..c509123bea49 100644 --- a/fs/Kconfig +++ b/fs/Kconfig @@ -1744,10 +1744,10 @@ config ROOT_NFS If you want your Linux box to mount its whole root file system (the one containing the directory /) from some other computer over the net via NFS (presumably because your box doesn't have a hard disk), - say Y. Read for details. It is - likely that in this case, you also want to say Y to "Kernel level IP - autoconfiguration" so that your box can discover its network address - at boot time. + say Y. Read for + details. It is likely that in this case, you also want to say Y to + "Kernel level IP autoconfiguration" so that your box can discover + its network address at boot time. Most people say N here. diff --git a/net/ipv4/Kconfig b/net/ipv4/Kconfig index 9c7e5ffb223d..4670683b4688 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/Kconfig +++ b/net/ipv4/Kconfig @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ config IP_PNP_DHCP If unsure, say Y. Note that if you want to use DHCP, a DHCP server must be operating on your network. Read - for details. + for details. config IP_PNP_BOOTP bool "IP: BOOTP support" @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ config IP_PNP_BOOTP does BOOTP itself, providing all necessary information on the kernel command line, you can say N here. If unsure, say Y. Note that if you want to use BOOTP, a BOOTP server must be operating on your network. - Read for details. + Read for details. config IP_PNP_RARP bool "IP: RARP support" @@ -187,8 +187,8 @@ config IP_PNP_RARP discovered automatically at boot time using the RARP protocol (an older protocol which is being obsoleted by BOOTP and DHCP), say Y here. Note that if you want to use RARP, a RARP server must be - operating on your network. Read for - details. + operating on your network. Read + for details. # not yet ready.. # bool ' IP: ARP support' CONFIG_IP_PNP_ARP diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipconfig.c b/net/ipv4/ipconfig.c index 7c992fbbc2c3..4824fe8996bf 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/ipconfig.c +++ b/net/ipv4/ipconfig.c @@ -1411,7 +1411,7 @@ late_initcall(ip_auto_config); /* * Decode any IP configuration options in the "ip=" or "nfsaddrs=" kernel - * command line parameter. See Documentation/nfsroot.txt. + * command line parameter. See Documentation/filesystems/nfsroot.txt. */ static int __init ic_proto_name(char *name) { From 8bcd1cc293f4e76edbfd8f422770c80a018b82d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 15:59:04 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 7/9] Documentation: move rpc-cache.txt to filesystems/ This file is nfs-related. (Maybe Documentation/filesystems/ would benefit from a separate nfs/ directory at some point.) Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- Documentation/00-INDEX | 2 -- Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX | 2 ++ Documentation/{ => filesystems}/rpc-cache.txt | 0 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename Documentation/{ => filesystems}/rpc-cache.txt (100%) diff --git a/Documentation/00-INDEX b/Documentation/00-INDEX index 08a39cdb27f2..e8fb24671967 100644 --- a/Documentation/00-INDEX +++ b/Documentation/00-INDEX @@ -319,8 +319,6 @@ robust-futexes.txt - a description of what robust futexes are. rocket.txt - info on the Comtrol RocketPort multiport serial driver. -rpc-cache.txt - - introduction to the caching mechanisms in the sunrpc layer. rt-mutex-design.txt - description of the RealTime mutex implementation design. rt-mutex.txt diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX b/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX index 2ec174c992f1..52cd611277a3 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX @@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ relay.txt - info on relay, for efficient streaming from kernel to user space. romfs.txt - description of the ROMFS filesystem. +rpc-cache.txt + - introduction to the caching mechanisms in the sunrpc layer. seq_file.txt - how to use the seq_file API sharedsubtree.txt diff --git a/Documentation/rpc-cache.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/rpc-cache.txt similarity index 100% rename from Documentation/rpc-cache.txt rename to Documentation/filesystems/rpc-cache.txt From d396c5f158547e50c2b78bc984cb4a72d76e969b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:39:38 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 8/9] Move sched-rt-group.txt to scheduler/ Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- Documentation/scheduler/00-INDEX | 2 ++ Documentation/{ => scheduler}/sched-rt-group.txt | 0 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) rename Documentation/{ => scheduler}/sched-rt-group.txt (100%) diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/00-INDEX b/Documentation/scheduler/00-INDEX index b5f5ca069b2d..fc234d093fbf 100644 --- a/Documentation/scheduler/00-INDEX +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/00-INDEX @@ -12,5 +12,7 @@ sched-domains.txt - information on scheduling domains. sched-nice-design.txt - How and why the scheduler's nice levels are implemented. +sched-rt-group.txt + - real-time group scheduling. sched-stats.txt - information on schedstats (Linux Scheduler Statistics). diff --git a/Documentation/sched-rt-group.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt similarity index 100% rename from Documentation/sched-rt-group.txt rename to Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt From 14dadf1d5eb5bea2dd115852cfee880505c1c169 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Fasheh Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:55:21 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 9/9] Add additional examples in Documentation/spinlocks.txt Checkpatch will throw an error if code doesn't use the correct initializers for static spinlocks: ERROR: Use of SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED is deprecated: see Documentation/spinlocks.txt This is fine, but Documentation/spinlocks.txt isn't very clear on how to _use_ the new initializers for static variables. To save people time in the future, I added two small examples of how to fix old-style static initializers to be more lockdep friendly. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- Documentation/spinlocks.txt | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/spinlocks.txt b/Documentation/spinlocks.txt index 471e75389778..619699dde593 100644 --- a/Documentation/spinlocks.txt +++ b/Documentation/spinlocks.txt @@ -5,6 +5,28 @@ Please use DEFINE_SPINLOCK()/DEFINE_RWLOCK() or __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED()/__RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED() as appropriate for static initialization. +Most of the time, you can simply turn: + + static spinlock_t xxx_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; + +into: + + static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(xxx_lock); + +Static structure member variables go from: + + struct foo bar { + .lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; + }; + +to: + + struct foo bar { + .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(bar.lock); + }; + +Declaration of static rw_locks undergo a similar transformation. + Dynamic initialization, when necessary, may be performed as demonstrated below.