[POWERPC] Make it blatantly clear; mpc5200 device tree is not yet stable

Documentation-only change.  The 5200 device tree layout has not yet
stablized, so nobody should depend on the layout of the tree.

Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Acked-by: Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
This commit is contained in:
Grant Likely 2007-01-19 00:00:14 -07:00 committed by Paul Mackerras
parent 77319254f1
commit 121361f72c
3 changed files with 18 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -4,6 +4,12 @@ MPC52xx Device Tree Bindings
(c) 2006 Secret Lab Technologies Ltd
Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
********** DRAFT ***********
* WARNING: Do not depend on the stability of these bindings just yet.
* The MPC5200 device tree conventions are still in flux
* Keep an eye on the linuxppc-dev mailing list for more details
********** DRAFT ***********
I - Introduction
================
Boards supported by the arch/powerpc architecture require device tree be

View file

@ -10,6 +10,12 @@
* option) any later version.
*/
/*
* WARNING: Do not depend on this tree layout remaining static just yet.
* The MPC5200 device tree conventions are still in flux
* Keep an eye on the linuxppc-dev mailing list for more details
*/
/ {
model = "Lite5200";
compatible = "lite5200\0lite52xx\0mpc5200\0mpc52xx";

View file

@ -10,6 +10,12 @@
* option) any later version.
*/
/*
* WARNING: Do not depend on this tree layout remaining static just yet.
* The MPC5200 device tree conventions are still in flux
* Keep an eye on the linuxppc-dev mailing list for more details
*/
/ {
model = "Lite5200b";
compatible = "lite5200b\0lite52xx\0mpc5200b\0mpc52xx";