Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

vfs: don't treat fl_type as a bitmap

Browse source 
The rules for fl_type are rather convoluted. Typically it's treated as
holding specific values, except in the case of LOCK_MAND, in which case
it can be or'ed with LOCK_READ|LOCK_WRITE.

On some arches F_WRLCK == 2 and F_UNLCK == 3, so and'ing with F_WRLCK will also
catch the F_UNLCK case. It's unlikely in either case here that we'd ever see
F_UNLCK since those shouldn't end up on any lists, but it's still best to be
consistent.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jeff Layton 2012-08-02 15:46:30 -04:00 committed by J. Bruce Fields
parent d10f27a750
commit 0ee5c6d632
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
fs/locks.c
View file

@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__break_lease);
void lease_get_mtime(struct inode *inode, struct timespec *time)
{
struct file_lock *flock = inode->i_flock;
if (flock && IS_LEASE(flock) && (flock->fl_type & F_WRLCK))
if (flock && IS_LEASE(flock) && (flock->fl_type == F_WRLCK))
*time = current_fs_time(inode->i_sb);
else
*time = inode->i_mtime;
@ -2187,8 +2187,8 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
} else {
seq_printf(f, "%s ",
(lease_breaking(fl))
? (fl->fl_type & F_UNLCK) ? "UNLCK" : "READ "
: (fl->fl_type & F_WRLCK) ? "WRITE" : "READ ");
? (fl->fl_type == F_UNLCK) ? "UNLCK" : "READ "
: (fl->fl_type == F_WRLCK) ? "WRITE" : "READ ");
}
if (inode) {
#ifdef WE_CAN_BREAK_LSLK_NOW