[SCSI] bnx2fc: Avoid calling bnx2fc_if_destroy with unnecessary locks
It is not required to hold rtnl_lock and bnx2fc_dev_lock when calling bnx2fc_if_destroy, as the locking is only required to serialize creation and deletion of fcoe instances. More importantly, this unnecessary locking causes deadlock as bnx2fc_if_destroy calls fc_remove_host holding rtnl_lock. Signed-off-by: Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi <bprakash@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
26b2982f78
commit
0cbf32e168
1 changed files with 2 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -1487,13 +1487,13 @@ static void bnx2fc_if_destroy(struct fc_lport *lport)
|
|||
static void __bnx2fc_destroy(struct bnx2fc_interface *interface)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct fc_lport *lport = interface->ctlr.lp;
|
||||
struct fcoe_port *port = lport_priv(lport);
|
||||
|
||||
bnx2fc_interface_cleanup(interface);
|
||||
bnx2fc_stop(interface);
|
||||
list_del(&interface->list);
|
||||
lport = interface->ctlr.lp;
|
||||
bnx2fc_interface_put(interface);
|
||||
bnx2fc_if_destroy(lport);
|
||||
queue_work(bnx2fc_wq, &port->destroy_work);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
@ -1541,11 +1541,7 @@ static void bnx2fc_destroy_work(struct work_struct *work)
|
|||
|
||||
BNX2FC_HBA_DBG(lport, "Entered bnx2fc_destroy_work\n");
|
||||
|
||||
rtnl_lock();
|
||||
mutex_lock(&bnx2fc_dev_lock);
|
||||
bnx2fc_if_destroy(lport);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&bnx2fc_dev_lock);
|
||||
rtnl_unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void bnx2fc_unbind_adapter_devices(struct bnx2fc_hba *hba)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue