mailbox: Stop using ENOSYS for anything other than unimplemented syscalls
In accordance withe15f431fe2
("errno.h: Improve ENOSYS's comment") and91c9afaf97
("checkpatch.pl: new instances of ENOSYS are errors") we're converting from the old meaning of: ENOSYS "Function not implemented" to a more standard EINVAL. Reported-by: Seraphin Bonnaffe <seraphin.bonnaffe@st.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d1c2f87c9a
commit
0c44d7896c
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -375,13 +375,13 @@ struct mbox_chan *mbox_request_channel_byname(struct mbox_client *cl,
|
|||
|
||||
if (!np) {
|
||||
dev_err(cl->dev, "%s() currently only supports DT\n", __func__);
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS);
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!of_get_property(np, "mbox-names", NULL)) {
|
||||
dev_err(cl->dev,
|
||||
"%s() requires an \"mbox-names\" property\n", __func__);
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS);
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
of_property_for_each_string(np, "mbox-names", prop, mbox_name) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue