x86: kprobes bugfix
Kprobes for x86-64 may cause a kernel crash if it inserted on "iret" instruction. "call absolute" is invalid on x86-64, so we don't need treat it. - Change the processing order as same as x86-32. - Add "iret"(0xcf) case. - Remove next_rip local variable. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
29b6cd794e
commit
0b0122faf4
1 changed files with 18 additions and 23 deletions
|
@ -485,7 +485,6 @@ static void __kprobes resume_execution(struct kprobe *p,
|
|||
struct pt_regs *regs, struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long *tos = (unsigned long *)regs->rsp;
|
||||
unsigned long next_rip = 0;
|
||||
unsigned long copy_rip = (unsigned long)p->ainsn.insn;
|
||||
unsigned long orig_rip = (unsigned long)p->addr;
|
||||
kprobe_opcode_t *insn = p->ainsn.insn;
|
||||
|
@ -494,46 +493,42 @@ static void __kprobes resume_execution(struct kprobe *p,
|
|||
if (*insn >= 0x40 && *insn <= 0x4f)
|
||||
insn++;
|
||||
|
||||
regs->eflags &= ~TF_MASK;
|
||||
switch (*insn) {
|
||||
case 0x9c: /* pushfl */
|
||||
case 0x9c: /* pushfl */
|
||||
*tos &= ~(TF_MASK | IF_MASK);
|
||||
*tos |= kcb->kprobe_old_rflags;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 0xc3: /* ret/lret */
|
||||
case 0xcb:
|
||||
case 0xc2:
|
||||
case 0xc2: /* iret/ret/lret */
|
||||
case 0xc3:
|
||||
case 0xca:
|
||||
regs->eflags &= ~TF_MASK;
|
||||
/* rip is already adjusted, no more changes required*/
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case 0xe8: /* call relative - Fix return addr */
|
||||
case 0xcb:
|
||||
case 0xcf:
|
||||
case 0xea: /* jmp absolute -- ip is correct */
|
||||
/* ip is already adjusted, no more changes required */
|
||||
goto no_change;
|
||||
case 0xe8: /* call relative - Fix return addr */
|
||||
*tos = orig_rip + (*tos - copy_rip);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 0xff:
|
||||
if ((insn[1] & 0x30) == 0x10) {
|
||||
/* call absolute, indirect */
|
||||
/* Fix return addr; rip is correct. */
|
||||
next_rip = regs->rip;
|
||||
/* Fix return addr; ip is correct. */
|
||||
*tos = orig_rip + (*tos - copy_rip);
|
||||
goto no_change;
|
||||
} else if (((insn[1] & 0x31) == 0x20) || /* jmp near, absolute indirect */
|
||||
((insn[1] & 0x31) == 0x21)) { /* jmp far, absolute indirect */
|
||||
/* rip is correct. */
|
||||
next_rip = regs->rip;
|
||||
/* ip is correct. */
|
||||
goto no_change;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 0xea: /* jmp absolute -- rip is correct */
|
||||
next_rip = regs->rip;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
regs->eflags &= ~TF_MASK;
|
||||
if (next_rip) {
|
||||
regs->rip = next_rip;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
regs->rip = orig_rip + (regs->rip - copy_rip);
|
||||
}
|
||||
regs->rip = orig_rip + (regs->rip - copy_rip);
|
||||
no_change:
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int __kprobes post_kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue