From 092fadd59b50208f6859f89dd7ea84e03955b544 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:49:43 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] genirq: Move MASK_ON_SUSPEND handling into suspend_device_irqs() There is no reason why we should delay the masking of interrupts whose interrupt chip requests MASK_ON_SUSPEND to the point where we check the wakeup interrupts. We can do it right at the point where we mark the interrupt as suspended. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- kernel/irq/pm.c | 21 +++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/irq/pm.c b/kernel/irq/pm.c index 74ca6bb541d5..a21b3dc9825a 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/pm.c +++ b/kernel/irq/pm.c @@ -56,6 +56,15 @@ static void suspend_device_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, int irq) desc->istate |= IRQS_SUSPENDED; __disable_irq(desc, irq); + + /* + * Hardware which has no wakeup source configuration facility + * requires that the non wakeup interrupts are masked at the + * chip level. The chip implementation indicates that with + * IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND. + */ + if (irq_desc_get_chip(desc)->flags & IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND) + mask_irq(desc); } /** @@ -176,19 +185,7 @@ int check_wakeup_irqs(void) if (irqd_is_wakeup_set(&desc->irq_data)) { if (desc->depth == 1 && desc->istate & IRQS_PENDING) return -EBUSY; - continue; } - /* - * Check the non wakeup interrupts whether they need - * to be masked before finally going into suspend - * state. That's for hardware which has no wakeup - * source configuration facility. The chip - * implementation indicates that with - * IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND. - */ - if (desc->istate & IRQS_SUSPENDED && - irq_desc_get_chip(desc)->flags & IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND) - mask_irq(desc); } return 0;