[PATCH] x86_64: Optimize bitmap_weight for small bitmaps
Use inline code bitmaps <= BITS_PER_LONG in bitmap_weight. This gives _much_ better code. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5282aab87a
commit
08cd36570e
1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
|
|||
* The available bitmap operations and their rough meaning in the
|
||||
* case that the bitmap is a single unsigned long are thus:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note that nbits should be always a compile time evaluable constant.
|
||||
* Otherwise many inlines will generate horrible code.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* bitmap_zero(dst, nbits) *dst = 0UL
|
||||
* bitmap_fill(dst, nbits) *dst = ~0UL
|
||||
* bitmap_copy(dst, src, nbits) *dst = *src
|
||||
|
@ -244,6 +247,8 @@ static inline int bitmap_full(const unsigned long *src, int nbits)
|
|||
|
||||
static inline int bitmap_weight(const unsigned long *src, int nbits)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (nbits <= BITS_PER_LONG)
|
||||
return hweight_long(*src & BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(nbits));
|
||||
return __bitmap_weight(src, nbits);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue