Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

bonding: fix bond_release_all inconsistencies

Browse source 
This patch fixes the following inconsistencies in bond_release_all:
- IFF_BONDING flag is not stripped from slaves
- MTU is not restored
- no netdev notifiers are sent
Instead of trying to keep bond_release and bond_release_all in sync
I think we can re-use bond_release as the environment for calling it
is correct (RTNL is held). I have been running tests for the past
week and they came out successful. The only way for bond_release to fail
is for the slave to be attached in a different bond or to not be a slave
but that cannot happen as RTNL is held and no slave manipulations can be
achieved.

V2: As suggested bond_release is renamed to __bond_release_one with a
new parameter "all" introduced so to avoid calling unnecessary code while
destroying a bond, and a wrapper for it called bond_release is created
because of ndo_del_link. bond_release_all() is removed.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
nikolay@redhat.com 2013-02-18 14:09:42 +00:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 7341a73c12
commit 0896341a44
1 changed files with 18 additions and 117 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

135
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
View file

@ -1937,7 +1937,8 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
/*
* Try to release the slave device <slave> from the bond device <master>
* It is legal to access curr_active_slave without a lock because all the function
* is write-locked.
* is write-locked. If "all" is true it means that the function is being called
* while destroying a bond interface and all slaves are being released.
*
* The rules for slave state should be:
* for Active/Backup:
@ -1945,7 +1946,9 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
* for Bonded connections:
* The first up interface should be left on and all others downed.
*/
int bond_release(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
struct net_device *slave_dev,
bool all)
{
struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
struct slave *slave, *oldcurrent;
@ -1982,7 +1985,7 @@ int bond_release(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
synchronize_net();
write_lock_bh(&bond->lock);
if (!bond->params.fail_over_mac) {
if (!all && !bond->params.fail_over_mac) {
if (ether_addr_equal(bond_dev->dev_addr, slave->perm_hwaddr) &&
bond->slave_cnt > 1)
pr_warning("%s: Warning: the permanent HWaddr of %s - %pM - is still in use by %s. Set the HWaddr of %s to a different address to avoid conflicts.\n",
@ -2028,7 +2031,9 @@ int bond_release(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
write_lock_bh(&bond->lock);
}
if (oldcurrent == slave) {
if (all) {
bond->curr_active_slave = NULL;
} else if (oldcurrent == slave) {
/*
* Note that we hold RTNL over this sequence, so there
* is no concern that another slave add/remove event
@ -2117,6 +2122,12 @@ int bond_release(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
return 0; /* deletion OK */
}
/* A wrapper used because of ndo_del_link */
int bond_release(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
{
return __bond_release_one(bond_dev, slave_dev, false);
}
/*
* First release a slave and then destroy the bond if no more slaves are left.
* Must be under rtnl_lock when this function is called.
@ -2137,118 +2148,6 @@ static int bond_release_and_destroy(struct net_device *bond_dev,
return ret;
}
/*
* This function releases all slaves.
*/
static int bond_release_all(struct net_device *bond_dev)
{
struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
struct slave *slave;
struct net_device *slave_dev;
struct sockaddr addr;
write_lock_bh(&bond->lock);
netif_carrier_off(bond_dev);
if (bond->slave_cnt == 0)
goto out;
bond->current_arp_slave = NULL;
bond->primary_slave = NULL;
bond_change_active_slave(bond, NULL);
while ((slave = bond->first_slave) != NULL) {
/* Inform AD package of unbinding of slave
* before slave is detached from the list.
*/
if (bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_8023AD)
bond_3ad_unbind_slave(slave);
slave_dev = slave->dev;
bond_detach_slave(bond, slave);
/* now that the slave is detached, unlock and perform
* all the undo steps that should not be called from
* within a lock.
*/
write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);
/* unregister rx_handler early so bond_handle_frame wouldn't
* be called for this slave anymore.
*/
netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
synchronize_net();
if (bond_is_lb(bond)) {
/* must be called only after the slave
* has been detached from the list
*/
bond_alb_deinit_slave(bond, slave);
}
bond_destroy_slave_symlinks(bond_dev, slave_dev);
bond_del_vlans_from_slave(bond, slave_dev);
/* If the mode USES_PRIMARY, then we should only remove its
* promisc and mc settings if it was the curr_active_slave, but that was
* already taken care of above when we detached the slave
*/
if (!USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode)) {
/* unset promiscuity level from slave */
if (bond_dev->flags & IFF_PROMISC)
dev_set_promiscuity(slave_dev, -1);
/* unset allmulti level from slave */
if (bond_dev->flags & IFF_ALLMULTI)
dev_set_allmulti(slave_dev, -1);
/* flush master's mc_list from slave */
netif_addr_lock_bh(bond_dev);
bond_mc_list_flush(bond_dev, slave_dev);
netif_addr_unlock_bh(bond_dev);
}
bond_upper_dev_unlink(bond_dev, slave_dev);
slave_disable_netpoll(slave);
/* close slave before restoring its mac address */
dev_close(slave_dev);
if (!bond->params.fail_over_mac) {
/* restore original ("permanent") mac address*/
memcpy(addr.sa_data, slave->perm_hwaddr, ETH_ALEN);
addr.sa_family = slave_dev->type;
dev_set_mac_address(slave_dev, &addr);
}
kfree(slave);
/* re-acquire the lock before getting the next slave */
write_lock_bh(&bond->lock);
}
eth_hw_addr_random(bond_dev);
bond->dev_addr_from_first = true;
if (bond_vlan_used(bond)) {
pr_warning("%s: Warning: clearing HW address of %s while it still has VLANs.\n",
bond_dev->name, bond_dev->name);
pr_warning("%s: When re-adding slaves, make sure the bond's HW address matches its VLANs'.\n",
bond_dev->name);
}
pr_info("%s: released all slaves\n", bond_dev->name);
out:
write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock);
bond_compute_features(bond);
return 0;
}
/*
* This function changes the active slave to slave <slave_dev>.
* It returns -EINVAL in the following cases.
@ -4440,7 +4339,9 @@ static void bond_uninit(struct net_device *bond_dev)
bond_netpoll_cleanup(bond_dev);
/* Release the bonded slaves */
bond_release_all(bond_dev);
while (bond->first_slave != NULL)
__bond_release_one(bond_dev, bond->first_slave->dev, true);
pr_info("%s: released all slaves\n", bond_dev->name);
list_del(&bond->bond_list);