ACPI: EC: fix dmesg spam regression
Return OBF_1 optimization workaround http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8459 Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
667984d9e4
commit
03d1d99c55
1 changed files with 11 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ enum {
|
|||
EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, /* Address is being written */
|
||||
EC_FLAGS_NO_WDATA_GPE, /* Don't expect WDATA GPE event */
|
||||
EC_FLAGS_WDATA, /* Data is being written */
|
||||
EC_FLAGS_NO_OBF1_GPE, /* Don't expect GPE before read */
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static int acpi_ec_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type);
|
||||
|
@ -179,6 +180,10 @@ static inline int acpi_ec_check_status(struct acpi_ec *ec, enum ec_event event)
|
|||
static int acpi_ec_wait(struct acpi_ec *ec, enum ec_event event, int force_poll)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(event == ACPI_EC_EVENT_OBF_1 &&
|
||||
test_bit(EC_FLAGS_NO_OBF1_GPE, &ec->flags)))
|
||||
force_poll = 1;
|
||||
if (unlikely(test_bit(EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, &ec->flags) &&
|
||||
test_bit(EC_FLAGS_NO_ADDRESS_GPE, &ec->flags)))
|
||||
force_poll = 1;
|
||||
|
@ -192,7 +197,12 @@ static int acpi_ec_wait(struct acpi_ec *ec, enum ec_event event, int force_poll)
|
|||
goto end;
|
||||
clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE, &ec->flags);
|
||||
if (acpi_ec_check_status(ec, event)) {
|
||||
if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, &ec->flags)) {
|
||||
if (event == ACPI_EC_EVENT_OBF_1) {
|
||||
/* miss OBF_1 GPE, don't expect it */
|
||||
pr_info(PREFIX "missing OBF confirmation, "
|
||||
"don't expect it any longer.\n");
|
||||
set_bit(EC_FLAGS_NO_OBF1_GPE, &ec->flags);
|
||||
} else if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, &ec->flags)) {
|
||||
/* miss address GPE, don't expect it anymore */
|
||||
pr_info(PREFIX "missing address confirmation, "
|
||||
"don't expect it any longer.\n");
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue