From 01839f6ddef011878e905d72786d95cee21ca039 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:25:29 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] libata-sff: Correct use of check_status()
ata_check_status() does an SFF compliant check
ata_chk_status() does a generic call to ap->ops->check_status (usually
ata_check_status)
libata-sff uses the wrong one. Hardly suprising given the naming here,
which ought to get fixed to ata_sff_check_status() perhaps ?
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
---
drivers/ata/libata-sff.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
index 026439e05afe..1232dcb6008d 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ void ata_tf_read(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_taskfile *tf)
{
struct ata_ioports *ioaddr = &ap->ioaddr;
- tf->command = ata_check_status(ap);
+ tf->command = ata_chk_status(ap);
tf->feature = ioread8(ioaddr->error_addr);
tf->nsect = ioread8(ioaddr->nsect_addr);
tf->lbal = ioread8(ioaddr->lbal_addr);