2010-08-17 12:37:37 -06:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Specialised local-global spinlock. Can only be declared as global variables
|
|
|
|
|
* to avoid overhead and keep things simple (and we don't want to start using
|
|
|
|
|
* these inside dynamically allocated structures).
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* "local/global locks" (lglocks) can be used to:
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* - Provide fast exclusive access to per-CPU data, with exclusive access to
|
|
|
|
|
* another CPU's data allowed but possibly subject to contention, and to
|
|
|
|
|
* provide very slow exclusive access to all per-CPU data.
|
|
|
|
|
* - Or to provide very fast and scalable read serialisation, and to provide
|
|
|
|
|
* very slow exclusive serialisation of data (not necessarily per-CPU data).
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Brlocks are also implemented as a short-hand notation for the latter use
|
|
|
|
|
* case.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* Copyright 2009, 2010, Nick Piggin, Novell Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __LINUX_LGLOCK_H
|
|
|
|
|
#define __LINUX_LGLOCK_H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/lockdep.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/percpu.h>
|
VFS: Fix race between CPU hotplug and lglocks
Currently, the *_global_[un]lock_online() routines are not at all synchronized
with CPU hotplug. Soft-lockups detected as a consequence of this race was
reported earlier at https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/24/185. (Thanks to Cong Meng
for finding out that the root-cause of this issue is the race condition
between br_write_[un]lock() and CPU hotplug, which results in the lock states
getting messed up).
Fixing this race by just adding {get,put}_online_cpus() at appropriate places
in *_global_[un]lock_online() is not a good option, because, then suddenly
br_write_[un]lock() would become blocking, whereas they have been kept as
non-blocking all this time, and we would want to keep them that way.
So, overall, we want to ensure 3 things:
1. br_write_lock() and br_write_unlock() must remain as non-blocking.
2. The corresponding lock and unlock of the per-cpu spinlocks must not happen
for different sets of CPUs.
3. Either prevent any new CPU online operation in between this lock-unlock, or
ensure that the newly onlined CPU does not proceed with its corresponding
per-cpu spinlock unlocked.
To achieve all this:
(a) We introduce a new spinlock that is taken by the *_global_lock_online()
routine and released by the *_global_unlock_online() routine.
(b) We register a callback for CPU hotplug notifications, and this callback
takes the same spinlock as above.
(c) We maintain a bitmap which is close to the cpu_online_mask, and once it is
initialized in the lock_init() code, all future updates to it are done in
the callback, under the above spinlock.
(d) The above bitmap is used (instead of cpu_online_mask) while locking and
unlocking the per-cpu locks.
The callback takes the spinlock upon the CPU_UP_PREPARE event. So, if the
br_write_lock-unlock sequence is in progress, the callback keeps spinning,
thus preventing the CPU online operation till the lock-unlock sequence is
complete. This takes care of requirement (3).
The bitmap that we maintain remains unmodified throughout the lock-unlock
sequence, since all updates to it are managed by the callback, which takes
the same spinlock as the one taken by the lock code and released only by the
unlock routine. Combining this with (d) above, satisfies requirement (2).
Overall, since we use a spinlock (mentioned in (a)) to prevent CPU hotplug
operations from racing with br_write_lock-unlock, requirement (1) is also
taken care of.
By the way, it is to be noted that a CPU offline operation can actually run
in parallel with our lock-unlock sequence, because our callback doesn't react
to notifications earlier than CPU_DEAD (in order to maintain our bitmap
properly). And this means, since we use our own bitmap (which is stale, on
purpose) during the lock-unlock sequence, we could end up unlocking the
per-cpu lock of an offline CPU (because we had locked it earlier, when the
CPU was online), in order to satisfy requirement (2). But this is harmless,
though it looks a bit awkward.
Debugged-by: Cong Meng <mc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2011-12-21 14:15:29 -07:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/cpu.h>
|
2012-05-07 22:02:24 -06:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/notifier.h>
|
2010-08-17 12:37:37 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2014-04-07 16:39:45 -06:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-17 12:37:37 -06:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
|
|
|
|
|
#define LOCKDEP_INIT_MAP lockdep_init_map
|
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
|
#define LOCKDEP_INIT_MAP(a, b, c, d)
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-05-07 22:02:24 -06:00
|
|
|
struct lglock {
|
|
|
|
|
arch_spinlock_t __percpu *lock;
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
|
|
|
|
|
struct lock_class_key lock_key;
|
|
|
|
|
struct lockdep_map lock_dep_map;
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
2010-08-17 12:37:37 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define DEFINE_LGLOCK(name) \
|
2012-10-09 15:49:51 -06:00
|
|
|
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(arch_spinlock_t, name ## _lock) \
|
2012-05-07 22:02:24 -06:00
|
|
|
= __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; \
|
|
|
|
|
struct lglock name = { .lock = &name ## _lock }
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-09 15:49:54 -06:00
|
|
|
#define DEFINE_STATIC_LGLOCK(name) \
|
|
|
|
|
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(arch_spinlock_t, name ## _lock) \
|
|
|
|
|
= __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; \
|
|
|
|
|
static struct lglock name = { .lock = &name ## _lock }
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-05-07 22:02:24 -06:00
|
|
|
void lg_lock_init(struct lglock *lg, char *name);
|
sched/stop_machine: Fix deadlock between multiple stop_two_cpus()
Jiri reported a machine stuck in multi_cpu_stop() with
migrate_swap_stop() as function and with the following src,dst cpu
pairs: {11, 4} {13, 11} { 4, 13}
4 11 13
cpuM: queue(4 ,13)
*Ma
cpuN: queue(13,11)
*N Na
*M Mb
cpuO: queue(11, 4)
*O Oa
*Nb
*Ob
Where *X denotes the cpu running the queueing of cpu-X and X[ab] denotes
the first/second queued work.
You'll observe the top of the workqueue for each cpu: 4,11,13 to be work
from cpus: M, O, N resp. IOW. deadlock.
Do away with the queueing trickery and introduce lg_double_lock() to
lock both CPUs and fully serialize the stop_two_cpus() callers instead
of the partial (and buggy) serialization we have now.
Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150605153023.GH19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-05 09:30:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2012-05-07 22:02:24 -06:00
|
|
|
void lg_local_lock(struct lglock *lg);
|
|
|
|
|
void lg_local_unlock(struct lglock *lg);
|
|
|
|
|
void lg_local_lock_cpu(struct lglock *lg, int cpu);
|
|
|
|
|
void lg_local_unlock_cpu(struct lglock *lg, int cpu);
|
sched/stop_machine: Fix deadlock between multiple stop_two_cpus()
Jiri reported a machine stuck in multi_cpu_stop() with
migrate_swap_stop() as function and with the following src,dst cpu
pairs: {11, 4} {13, 11} { 4, 13}
4 11 13
cpuM: queue(4 ,13)
*Ma
cpuN: queue(13,11)
*N Na
*M Mb
cpuO: queue(11, 4)
*O Oa
*Nb
*Ob
Where *X denotes the cpu running the queueing of cpu-X and X[ab] denotes
the first/second queued work.
You'll observe the top of the workqueue for each cpu: 4,11,13 to be work
from cpus: M, O, N resp. IOW. deadlock.
Do away with the queueing trickery and introduce lg_double_lock() to
lock both CPUs and fully serialize the stop_two_cpus() callers instead
of the partial (and buggy) serialization we have now.
Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150605153023.GH19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-06-05 09:30:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void lg_double_lock(struct lglock *lg, int cpu1, int cpu2);
|
|
|
|
|
void lg_double_unlock(struct lglock *lg, int cpu1, int cpu2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-05-07 22:02:24 -06:00
|
|
|
void lg_global_lock(struct lglock *lg);
|
|
|
|
|
void lg_global_unlock(struct lglock *lg);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-07 16:39:45 -06:00
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
|
/* When !CONFIG_SMP, map lglock to spinlock */
|
|
|
|
|
#define lglock spinlock
|
|
|
|
|
#define DEFINE_LGLOCK(name) DEFINE_SPINLOCK(name)
|
|
|
|
|
#define DEFINE_STATIC_LGLOCK(name) static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(name)
|
|
|
|
|
#define lg_lock_init(lg, name) spin_lock_init(lg)
|
|
|
|
|
#define lg_local_lock spin_lock
|
|
|
|
|
#define lg_local_unlock spin_unlock
|
|
|
|
|
#define lg_local_lock_cpu(lg, cpu) spin_lock(lg)
|
|
|
|
|
#define lg_local_unlock_cpu(lg, cpu) spin_unlock(lg)
|
|
|
|
|
#define lg_global_lock spin_lock
|
|
|
|
|
#define lg_global_unlock spin_unlock
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-17 12:37:37 -06:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
