Techwizz/kernel-fxtec-pro1x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity
kernel-fxtec-pro1x/arch/sparc/lib/bitops.S

142 lines
2.7 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

[SPARC64]: Implement atomic backoff. When the cpu count is high and contention hits an atomic object, the processors can synchronize such that some cpus continually get knocked out and cannot complete the atomic update. So implement an exponential backoff when SMP. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-15 17:41:44 -06:00
/* bitops.S: Sparc64 atomic bit operations.
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
*
[SPARC64]: Implement atomic backoff. When the cpu count is high and contention hits an atomic object, the processors can synchronize such that some cpus continually get knocked out and cannot complete the atomic update. So implement an exponential backoff when SMP. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-15 17:41:44 -06:00
* Copyright (C) 2000, 2007 David S. Miller (davem@davemloft.net)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
*/
#include <asm/asi.h>
[SPARC64]: Implement atomic backoff. When the cpu count is high and contention hits an atomic object, the processors can synchronize such that some cpus continually get knocked out and cannot complete the atomic update. So implement an exponential backoff when SMP. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-15 17:41:44 -06:00
#include <asm/backoff.h>
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots. In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay slot of a jmpl instruction. UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51 The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions. If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer. We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-27 16:42:04 -06:00
.text
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
.globl test_and_set_bit
.type test_and_set_bit,#function
test_and_set_bit: /* %o0=nr, %o1=addr */
[SPARC64]: Implement atomic backoff. When the cpu count is high and contention hits an atomic object, the processors can synchronize such that some cpus continually get knocked out and cannot complete the atomic update. So implement an exponential backoff when SMP. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-15 17:41:44 -06:00
BACKOFF_SETUP(%o3)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
srlx %o0, 6, %g1
mov 1, %o2
sllx %g1, 3, %g3
and %o0, 63, %g2
sllx %o2, %g2, %o2
add %o1, %g3, %o1
1: ldx [%o1], %g7
or %g7, %o2, %g1
casx [%o1], %g7, %g1
cmp %g7, %g1
sparc64: Make lock backoff really a NOP on UP builds. As noticed by Mikulas Patocka, the backoff macros don't completely nop out for UP builds, we still get a branch always and a delay slot nop. Fix this by making the branch to the backoff spin loop selective, then we can nop out the spin loop completely. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-08-18 23:53:26 -06:00
bne,pn %xcc, BACKOFF_LABEL(2f, 1b)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
and %g7, %o2, %g2
clr %o0
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots. In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay slot of a jmpl instruction. UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51 The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions. If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer. We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-27 16:42:04 -06:00
movrne %g2, 1, %o0
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
retl
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots. In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay slot of a jmpl instruction. UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51 The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions. If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer. We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-27 16:42:04 -06:00
nop
[SPARC64]: Implement atomic backoff. When the cpu count is high and contention hits an atomic object, the processors can synchronize such that some cpus continually get knocked out and cannot complete the atomic update. So implement an exponential backoff when SMP. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-15 17:41:44 -06:00
2: BACKOFF_SPIN(%o3, %o4, 1b)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
.size test_and_set_bit, .-test_and_set_bit
.globl test_and_clear_bit
.type test_and_clear_bit,#function
test_and_clear_bit: /* %o0=nr, %o1=addr */
[SPARC64]: Implement atomic backoff. When the cpu count is high and contention hits an atomic object, the processors can synchronize such that some cpus continually get knocked out and cannot complete the atomic update. So implement an exponential backoff when SMP. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-15 17:41:44 -06:00
BACKOFF_SETUP(%o3)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
srlx %o0, 6, %g1
mov 1, %o2
sllx %g1, 3, %g3
and %o0, 63, %g2
sllx %o2, %g2, %o2
add %o1, %g3, %o1
1: ldx [%o1], %g7
andn %g7, %o2, %g1
casx [%o1], %g7, %g1
cmp %g7, %g1
sparc64: Make lock backoff really a NOP on UP builds. As noticed by Mikulas Patocka, the backoff macros don't completely nop out for UP builds, we still get a branch always and a delay slot nop. Fix this by making the branch to the backoff spin loop selective, then we can nop out the spin loop completely. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-08-18 23:53:26 -06:00
bne,pn %xcc, BACKOFF_LABEL(2f, 1b)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
and %g7, %o2, %g2
clr %o0
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots. In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay slot of a jmpl instruction. UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51 The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions. If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer. We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-27 16:42:04 -06:00
movrne %g2, 1, %o0
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
retl
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots. In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay slot of a jmpl instruction. UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51 The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions. If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer. We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-27 16:42:04 -06:00
nop
[SPARC64]: Implement atomic backoff. When the cpu count is high and contention hits an atomic object, the processors can synchronize such that some cpus continually get knocked out and cannot complete the atomic update. So implement an exponential backoff when SMP. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-15 17:41:44 -06:00
2: BACKOFF_SPIN(%o3, %o4, 1b)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
.size test_and_clear_bit, .-test_and_clear_bit
.globl test_and_change_bit
.type test_and_change_bit,#function
test_and_change_bit: /* %o0=nr, %o1=addr */
[SPARC64]: Implement atomic backoff. When the cpu count is high and contention hits an atomic object, the processors can synchronize such that some cpus continually get knocked out and cannot complete the atomic update. So implement an exponential backoff when SMP. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-15 17:41:44 -06:00
BACKOFF_SETUP(%o3)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
srlx %o0, 6, %g1
mov 1, %o2
sllx %g1, 3, %g3
and %o0, 63, %g2
sllx %o2, %g2, %o2
add %o1, %g3, %o1
1: ldx [%o1], %g7
xor %g7, %o2, %g1
casx [%o1], %g7, %g1
cmp %g7, %g1
sparc64: Make lock backoff really a NOP on UP builds. As noticed by Mikulas Patocka, the backoff macros don't completely nop out for UP builds, we still get a branch always and a delay slot nop. Fix this by making the branch to the backoff spin loop selective, then we can nop out the spin loop completely. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-08-18 23:53:26 -06:00
bne,pn %xcc, BACKOFF_LABEL(2f, 1b)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
and %g7, %o2, %g2
clr %o0
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots. In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay slot of a jmpl instruction. UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51 The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions. If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer. We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-27 16:42:04 -06:00
movrne %g2, 1, %o0
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
retl
[SPARC64]: Avoid membar instructions in delay slots. In particular, avoid membar instructions in the delay slot of a jmpl instruction. UltraSPARC-I, II, IIi, and IIe have a bug, documented in the UltraSPARC-IIi User's Manual, Appendix K, Erratum 51 The long and short of it is that if the IMU unit misses on a branch or jmpl, and there is a store buffer synchronizing membar in the delay slot, the chip can stop fetching instructions. If interrupts are enabled or some other trap is enabled, the chip will unwedge itself, but performance will suffer. We already had a workaround for this bug in a few spots, but it's better to have the entire tree sanitized for this rule. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-27 16:42:04 -06:00
nop
[SPARC64]: Implement atomic backoff. When the cpu count is high and contention hits an atomic object, the processors can synchronize such that some cpus continually get knocked out and cannot complete the atomic update. So implement an exponential backoff when SMP. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-15 17:41:44 -06:00
2: BACKOFF_SPIN(%o3, %o4, 1b)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
.size test_and_change_bit, .-test_and_change_bit
.globl set_bit
.type set_bit,#function
set_bit: /* %o0=nr, %o1=addr */
[SPARC64]: Implement atomic backoff. When the cpu count is high and contention hits an atomic object, the processors can synchronize such that some cpus continually get knocked out and cannot complete the atomic update. So implement an exponential backoff when SMP. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-15 17:41:44 -06:00
BACKOFF_SETUP(%o3)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
srlx %o0, 6, %g1
mov 1, %o2
sllx %g1, 3, %g3
and %o0, 63, %g2
sllx %o2, %g2, %o2
add %o1, %g3, %o1
1: ldx [%o1], %g7
or %g7, %o2, %g1
casx [%o1], %g7, %g1
cmp %g7, %g1
sparc64: Make lock backoff really a NOP on UP builds. As noticed by Mikulas Patocka, the backoff macros don't completely nop out for UP builds, we still get a branch always and a delay slot nop. Fix this by making the branch to the backoff spin loop selective, then we can nop out the spin loop completely. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-08-18 23:53:26 -06:00
bne,pn %xcc, BACKOFF_LABEL(2f, 1b)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
nop
retl
nop
[SPARC64]: Implement atomic backoff. When the cpu count is high and contention hits an atomic object, the processors can synchronize such that some cpus continually get knocked out and cannot complete the atomic update. So implement an exponential backoff when SMP. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-15 17:41:44 -06:00
2: BACKOFF_SPIN(%o3, %o4, 1b)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
.size set_bit, .-set_bit
.globl clear_bit
.type clear_bit,#function
clear_bit: /* %o0=nr, %o1=addr */
[SPARC64]: Implement atomic backoff. When the cpu count is high and contention hits an atomic object, the processors can synchronize such that some cpus continually get knocked out and cannot complete the atomic update. So implement an exponential backoff when SMP. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-15 17:41:44 -06:00
BACKOFF_SETUP(%o3)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
srlx %o0, 6, %g1
mov 1, %o2
sllx %g1, 3, %g3
and %o0, 63, %g2
sllx %o2, %g2, %o2
add %o1, %g3, %o1
1: ldx [%o1], %g7
andn %g7, %o2, %g1
casx [%o1], %g7, %g1
cmp %g7, %g1
sparc64: Make lock backoff really a NOP on UP builds. As noticed by Mikulas Patocka, the backoff macros don't completely nop out for UP builds, we still get a branch always and a delay slot nop. Fix this by making the branch to the backoff spin loop selective, then we can nop out the spin loop completely. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-08-18 23:53:26 -06:00
bne,pn %xcc, BACKOFF_LABEL(2f, 1b)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
nop
retl
nop
[SPARC64]: Implement atomic backoff. When the cpu count is high and contention hits an atomic object, the processors can synchronize such that some cpus continually get knocked out and cannot complete the atomic update. So implement an exponential backoff when SMP. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-15 17:41:44 -06:00
2: BACKOFF_SPIN(%o3, %o4, 1b)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
.size clear_bit, .-clear_bit
.globl change_bit
.type change_bit,#function
change_bit: /* %o0=nr, %o1=addr */
[SPARC64]: Implement atomic backoff. When the cpu count is high and contention hits an atomic object, the processors can synchronize such that some cpus continually get knocked out and cannot complete the atomic update. So implement an exponential backoff when SMP. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-15 17:41:44 -06:00
BACKOFF_SETUP(%o3)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
srlx %o0, 6, %g1
mov 1, %o2
sllx %g1, 3, %g3
and %o0, 63, %g2
sllx %o2, %g2, %o2
add %o1, %g3, %o1
1: ldx [%o1], %g7
xor %g7, %o2, %g1
casx [%o1], %g7, %g1
cmp %g7, %g1
sparc64: Make lock backoff really a NOP on UP builds. As noticed by Mikulas Patocka, the backoff macros don't completely nop out for UP builds, we still get a branch always and a delay slot nop. Fix this by making the branch to the backoff spin loop selective, then we can nop out the spin loop completely. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2010-08-18 23:53:26 -06:00
bne,pn %xcc, BACKOFF_LABEL(2f, 1b)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
nop
retl
nop
[SPARC64]: Implement atomic backoff. When the cpu count is high and contention hits an atomic object, the processors can synchronize such that some cpus continually get knocked out and cannot complete the atomic update. So implement an exponential backoff when SMP. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-15 17:41:44 -06:00
2: BACKOFF_SPIN(%o3, %o4, 1b)
Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
2005-04-16 16:20:36 -06:00
.size change_bit, .-change_bit
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink