regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
* twl-regulator.c -- support regulators in twl4030/twl6030 family chips
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2008 David Brownell
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
|
|
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
|
|
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
|
|
|
|
* (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/module.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/init.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/err.h>
|
2009-12-16 05:55:26 -07:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/delay.h>
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
|
2009-12-13 12:05:51 -07:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/i2c/twl.h>
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
* The TWL4030/TW5030/TPS659x0/TWL6030 family chips include power management, a
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
* USB OTG transceiver, an RTC, ADC, PWM, and lots more. Some versions
|
|
|
|
* include an audio codec, battery charger, and more voltage regulators.
|
|
|
|
* These chips are often used in OMAP-based systems.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This driver implements software-based resource control for various
|
|
|
|
* voltage regulators. This is usually augmented with state machine
|
|
|
|
* based control.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info {
|
|
|
|
/* start of regulator's PM_RECEIVER control register bank */
|
|
|
|
u8 base;
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
/* twl resource ID, for resource control state machine */
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
u8 id;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* voltage in mV = table[VSEL]; table_len must be a power-of-two */
|
|
|
|
u8 table_len;
|
|
|
|
const u16 *table;
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-16 05:49:52 -07:00
|
|
|
/* regulator specific turn-on delay */
|
|
|
|
u16 delay;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* State REMAP default configuration */
|
|
|
|
u8 remap;
|
|
|
|
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
/* chip constraints on regulator behavior */
|
|
|
|
u16 min_mV;
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
u16 max_mV;
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
u8 flags;
|
|
|
|
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
/* used by regulator core */
|
|
|
|
struct regulator_desc desc;
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* chip specific features */
|
|
|
|
unsigned long features;
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* LDO control registers ... offset is from the base of its register bank.
|
|
|
|
* The first three registers of all power resource banks help hardware to
|
|
|
|
* manage the various resource groups.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
/* Common offset in TWL4030/6030 */
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
#define VREG_GRP 0
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
/* TWL4030 register offsets */
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
#define VREG_TYPE 1
|
|
|
|
#define VREG_REMAP 2
|
|
|
|
#define VREG_DEDICATED 3 /* LDO control */
|
2011-11-28 07:53:19 -07:00
|
|
|
#define VREG_VOLTAGE_SMPS_4030 9
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
/* TWL6030 register offsets */
|
|
|
|
#define VREG_TRANS 1
|
|
|
|
#define VREG_STATE 2
|
|
|
|
#define VREG_VOLTAGE 3
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
#define VREG_VOLTAGE_SMPS 4
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
/* TWL6030 Misc register offsets */
|
|
|
|
#define VREG_BC_ALL 1
|
|
|
|
#define VREG_BC_REF 2
|
|
|
|
#define VREG_BC_PROC 3
|
|
|
|
#define VREG_BC_CLK_RST 4
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:42 -06:00
|
|
|
/* TWL6030 LDO register values for CFG_STATE */
|
|
|
|
#define TWL6030_CFG_STATE_OFF 0x00
|
|
|
|
#define TWL6030_CFG_STATE_ON 0x01
|
2011-03-31 22:52:45 -06:00
|
|
|
#define TWL6030_CFG_STATE_OFF2 0x02
|
|
|
|
#define TWL6030_CFG_STATE_SLEEP 0x03
|
2011-03-31 22:52:42 -06:00
|
|
|
#define TWL6030_CFG_STATE_GRP_SHIFT 5
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
#define TWL6030_CFG_STATE_APP_SHIFT 2
|
|
|
|
#define TWL6030_CFG_STATE_APP_MASK (0x03 << TWL6030_CFG_STATE_APP_SHIFT)
|
|
|
|
#define TWL6030_CFG_STATE_APP(v) (((v) & TWL6030_CFG_STATE_APP_MASK) >>\
|
|
|
|
TWL6030_CFG_STATE_APP_SHIFT)
|
2011-03-31 22:52:42 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
/* Flags for SMPS Voltage reading */
|
|
|
|
#define SMPS_OFFSET_EN BIT(0)
|
|
|
|
#define SMPS_EXTENDED_EN BIT(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* twl6025 SMPS EPROM values */
|
|
|
|
#define TWL6030_SMPS_OFFSET 0xB0
|
|
|
|
#define TWL6030_SMPS_MULT 0xB3
|
|
|
|
#define SMPS_MULTOFFSET_SMPS4 BIT(0)
|
|
|
|
#define SMPS_MULTOFFSET_VIO BIT(1)
|
|
|
|
#define SMPS_MULTOFFSET_SMPS3 BIT(6)
|
|
|
|
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
static inline int
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
twlreg_read(struct twlreg_info *info, unsigned slave_subgp, unsigned offset)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u8 value;
|
|
|
|
int status;
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
status = twl_i2c_read_u8(slave_subgp,
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
&value, info->base + offset);
|
|
|
|
return (status < 0) ? status : value;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline int
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
twlreg_write(struct twlreg_info *info, unsigned slave_subgp, unsigned offset,
|
|
|
|
u8 value)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
return twl_i2c_write_u8(slave_subgp,
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
value, info->base + offset);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* generic power resource operations, which work on all regulators */
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
static int twlreg_grp(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
return twlreg_read(rdev_get_drvdata(rdev), TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER,
|
|
|
|
VREG_GRP);
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Enable/disable regulators by joining/leaving the P1 (processor) group.
|
|
|
|
* We assume nobody else is updating the DEV_GRP registers.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
/* definition for 4030 family */
|
|
|
|
#define P3_GRP_4030 BIT(7) /* "peripherals" */
|
|
|
|
#define P2_GRP_4030 BIT(6) /* secondary processor, modem, etc */
|
|
|
|
#define P1_GRP_4030 BIT(5) /* CPU/Linux */
|
|
|
|
/* definition for 6030 family */
|
|
|
|
#define P3_GRP_6030 BIT(2) /* secondary processor, modem, etc */
|
|
|
|
#define P2_GRP_6030 BIT(1) /* "peripherals" */
|
|
|
|
#define P1_GRP_6030 BIT(0) /* CPU/Linux */
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
static int twl4030reg_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
int state = twlreg_grp(rdev);
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (state < 0)
|
|
|
|
return state;
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
return state & P1_GRP_4030;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int twl6030reg_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
int grp = 0, val;
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
if (!(twl_class_is_6030() && (info->features & TWL6025_SUBCLASS)))
|
|
|
|
grp = twlreg_read(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_GRP);
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
if (grp < 0)
|
|
|
|
return grp;
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
if (!(twl_class_is_6030() && (info->features & TWL6025_SUBCLASS)))
|
|
|
|
grp &= P1_GRP_6030;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
grp = 1;
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
val = twlreg_read(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_STATE);
|
|
|
|
val = TWL6030_CFG_STATE_APP(val);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return grp && (val == TWL6030_CFG_STATE_ON);
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-20 07:33:51 -06:00
|
|
|
static int twl4030reg_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
int grp;
|
2009-12-16 05:55:26 -07:00
|
|
|
int ret;
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
grp = twlreg_read(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_GRP);
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
if (grp < 0)
|
|
|
|
return grp;
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-20 07:33:51 -06:00
|
|
|
grp |= P1_GRP_4030;
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-16 05:55:26 -07:00
|
|
|
ret = twlreg_write(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_GRP, grp);
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-20 07:33:51 -06:00
|
|
|
udelay(info->delay);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int twl6030reg_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
int grp = 0;
|
2011-05-20 07:33:51 -06:00
|
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
if (!(twl_class_is_6030() && (info->features & TWL6025_SUBCLASS)))
|
|
|
|
grp = twlreg_read(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_GRP);
|
2011-05-20 07:33:51 -06:00
|
|
|
if (grp < 0)
|
|
|
|
return grp;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ret = twlreg_write(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_STATE,
|
|
|
|
grp << TWL6030_CFG_STATE_GRP_SHIFT |
|
|
|
|
TWL6030_CFG_STATE_ON);
|
2011-03-31 22:52:42 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-16 05:55:26 -07:00
|
|
|
udelay(info->delay);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-20 07:33:52 -06:00
|
|
|
static int twl4030reg_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
int grp;
|
2011-03-31 22:52:42 -06:00
|
|
|
int ret;
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
grp = twlreg_read(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_GRP);
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
if (grp < 0)
|
|
|
|
return grp;
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-20 07:33:52 -06:00
|
|
|
grp &= ~(P1_GRP_4030 | P2_GRP_4030 | P3_GRP_4030);
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:42 -06:00
|
|
|
ret = twlreg_write(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_GRP, grp);
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-20 07:33:52 -06:00
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int twl6030reg_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
int grp = 0;
|
|
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
if (!(twl_class_is_6030() && (info->features & TWL6025_SUBCLASS)))
|
|
|
|
grp = P1_GRP_6030 | P2_GRP_6030 | P3_GRP_6030;
|
2011-05-20 07:33:52 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* For 6030, set the off state for all grps enabled */
|
|
|
|
ret = twlreg_write(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_STATE,
|
|
|
|
(grp) << TWL6030_CFG_STATE_GRP_SHIFT |
|
|
|
|
TWL6030_CFG_STATE_OFF);
|
2011-03-31 22:52:42 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:45 -06:00
|
|
|
static int twl4030reg_get_status(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
int state = twlreg_grp(rdev);
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (state < 0)
|
|
|
|
return state;
|
|
|
|
state &= 0x0f;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* assume state != WARM_RESET; we'd not be running... */
|
|
|
|
if (!state)
|
|
|
|
return REGULATOR_STATUS_OFF;
|
|
|
|
return (state & BIT(3))
|
|
|
|
? REGULATOR_STATUS_NORMAL
|
|
|
|
: REGULATOR_STATUS_STANDBY;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:45 -06:00
|
|
|
static int twl6030reg_get_status(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
int val;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
val = twlreg_grp(rdev);
|
|
|
|
if (val < 0)
|
|
|
|
return val;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
val = twlreg_read(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_STATE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (TWL6030_CFG_STATE_APP(val)) {
|
|
|
|
case TWL6030_CFG_STATE_ON:
|
|
|
|
return REGULATOR_STATUS_NORMAL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case TWL6030_CFG_STATE_SLEEP:
|
|
|
|
return REGULATOR_STATUS_STANDBY;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case TWL6030_CFG_STATE_OFF:
|
|
|
|
case TWL6030_CFG_STATE_OFF2:
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return REGULATOR_STATUS_OFF;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:46 -06:00
|
|
|
static int twl4030reg_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned mode)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
unsigned message;
|
|
|
|
int status;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* We can only set the mode through state machine commands... */
|
|
|
|
switch (mode) {
|
|
|
|
case REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL:
|
|
|
|
message = MSG_SINGULAR(DEV_GRP_P1, info->id, RES_STATE_ACTIVE);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY:
|
|
|
|
message = MSG_SINGULAR(DEV_GRP_P1, info->id, RES_STATE_SLEEP);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Ensure the resource is associated with some group */
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
status = twlreg_grp(rdev);
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
if (status < 0)
|
|
|
|
return status;
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
if (!(status & (P3_GRP_4030 | P2_GRP_4030 | P1_GRP_4030)))
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
return -EACCES;
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
status = twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL_MODULE_PM_MASTER,
|
2010-10-22 02:38:22 -06:00
|
|
|
message >> 8, TWL4030_PM_MASTER_PB_WORD_MSB);
|
|
|
|
if (status < 0)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
return status;
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
return twl_i2c_write_u8(TWL_MODULE_PM_MASTER,
|
2010-10-22 02:38:22 -06:00
|
|
|
message & 0xff, TWL4030_PM_MASTER_PB_WORD_LSB);
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:46 -06:00
|
|
|
static int twl6030reg_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned mode)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
int grp = 0;
|
2011-03-31 22:52:46 -06:00
|
|
|
int val;
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
if (!(twl_class_is_6030() && (info->features & TWL6025_SUBCLASS)))
|
|
|
|
grp = twlreg_read(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_GRP);
|
2011-03-31 22:52:46 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (grp < 0)
|
|
|
|
return grp;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Compose the state register settings */
|
|
|
|
val = grp << TWL6030_CFG_STATE_GRP_SHIFT;
|
|
|
|
/* We can only set the mode through state machine commands... */
|
|
|
|
switch (mode) {
|
|
|
|
case REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL:
|
|
|
|
val |= TWL6030_CFG_STATE_ON;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY:
|
|
|
|
val |= TWL6030_CFG_STATE_SLEEP;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return twlreg_write(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_STATE, val);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Support for adjustable-voltage LDOs uses a four bit (or less) voltage
|
|
|
|
* select field in its control register. We use tables indexed by VSEL
|
|
|
|
* to record voltages in milliVolts. (Accuracy is about three percent.)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Note that VSEL values for VAUX2 changed in twl5030 and newer silicon;
|
|
|
|
* currently handled by listing two slightly different VAUX2 regulators,
|
|
|
|
* only one of which will be configured.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* VSEL values documented as "TI cannot support these values" are flagged
|
|
|
|
* in these tables as UNSUP() values; we normally won't assign them.
|
2009-03-06 05:51:30 -07:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* VAUX3 at 3V is incorrectly listed in some TI manuals as unsupported.
|
|
|
|
* TI are revising the twl5030/tps659x0 specs to support that 3.0V setting.
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_TWL4030_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED
|
|
|
|
#define UNSUP_MASK 0x0000
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
#define UNSUP_MASK 0x8000
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define UNSUP(x) (UNSUP_MASK | (x))
|
|
|
|
#define IS_UNSUP(x) (UNSUP_MASK & (x))
|
|
|
|
#define LDO_MV(x) (~UNSUP_MASK & (x))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const u16 VAUX1_VSEL_table[] = {
|
|
|
|
UNSUP(1500), UNSUP(1800), 2500, 2800,
|
|
|
|
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static const u16 VAUX2_4030_VSEL_table[] = {
|
|
|
|
UNSUP(1000), UNSUP(1000), UNSUP(1200), 1300,
|
|
|
|
1500, 1800, UNSUP(1850), 2500,
|
|
|
|
UNSUP(2600), 2800, UNSUP(2850), UNSUP(3000),
|
|
|
|
UNSUP(3150), UNSUP(3150), UNSUP(3150), UNSUP(3150),
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static const u16 VAUX2_VSEL_table[] = {
|
|
|
|
1700, 1700, 1900, 1300,
|
|
|
|
1500, 1800, 2000, 2500,
|
|
|
|
2100, 2800, 2200, 2300,
|
|
|
|
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static const u16 VAUX3_VSEL_table[] = {
|
|
|
|
1500, 1800, 2500, 2800,
|
2009-03-06 05:51:30 -07:00
|
|
|
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000,
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static const u16 VAUX4_VSEL_table[] = {
|
|
|
|
700, 1000, 1200, UNSUP(1300),
|
|
|
|
1500, 1800, UNSUP(1850), 2500,
|
2009-03-10 13:51:15 -06:00
|
|
|
UNSUP(2600), 2800, UNSUP(2850), UNSUP(3000),
|
|
|
|
UNSUP(3150), UNSUP(3150), UNSUP(3150), UNSUP(3150),
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static const u16 VMMC1_VSEL_table[] = {
|
|
|
|
1850, 2850, 3000, 3150,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static const u16 VMMC2_VSEL_table[] = {
|
|
|
|
UNSUP(1000), UNSUP(1000), UNSUP(1200), UNSUP(1300),
|
|
|
|
UNSUP(1500), UNSUP(1800), 1850, UNSUP(2500),
|
|
|
|
2600, 2800, 2850, 3000,
|
|
|
|
3150, 3150, 3150, 3150,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static const u16 VPLL1_VSEL_table[] = {
|
|
|
|
1000, 1200, 1300, 1800,
|
|
|
|
UNSUP(2800), UNSUP(3000), UNSUP(3000), UNSUP(3000),
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static const u16 VPLL2_VSEL_table[] = {
|
|
|
|
700, 1000, 1200, 1300,
|
|
|
|
UNSUP(1500), 1800, UNSUP(1850), UNSUP(2500),
|
|
|
|
UNSUP(2600), UNSUP(2800), UNSUP(2850), UNSUP(3000),
|
|
|
|
UNSUP(3150), UNSUP(3150), UNSUP(3150), UNSUP(3150),
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static const u16 VSIM_VSEL_table[] = {
|
|
|
|
UNSUP(1000), UNSUP(1200), UNSUP(1300), 1800,
|
|
|
|
2800, 3000, 3000, 3000,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static const u16 VDAC_VSEL_table[] = {
|
|
|
|
1200, 1300, 1800, 1800,
|
|
|
|
};
|
2009-12-16 06:27:55 -07:00
|
|
|
static const u16 VDD1_VSEL_table[] = {
|
|
|
|
800, 1450,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static const u16 VDD2_VSEL_table[] = {
|
|
|
|
800, 1450, 1500,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static const u16 VIO_VSEL_table[] = {
|
|
|
|
1800, 1850,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static const u16 VINTANA2_VSEL_table[] = {
|
|
|
|
2500, 2750,
|
|
|
|
};
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
static int twl4030ldo_list_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned index)
|
2009-02-26 12:50:14 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
int mV = info->table[index];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return IS_UNSUP(mV) ? 0 : (LDO_MV(mV) * 1000);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
static int
|
2010-11-10 07:38:29 -07:00
|
|
|
twl4030ldo_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV, int max_uV,
|
|
|
|
unsigned *selector)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
int vsel;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (vsel = 0; vsel < info->table_len; vsel++) {
|
|
|
|
int mV = info->table[vsel];
|
|
|
|
int uV;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (IS_UNSUP(mV))
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
uV = LDO_MV(mV) * 1000;
|
|
|
|
|
2009-02-26 12:50:14 -07:00
|
|
|
/* REVISIT for VAUX2, first match may not be best/lowest */
|
|
|
|
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
/* use the first in-range value */
|
2010-11-10 07:38:29 -07:00
|
|
|
if (min_uV <= uV && uV <= max_uV) {
|
|
|
|
*selector = vsel;
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
return twlreg_write(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER,
|
|
|
|
VREG_VOLTAGE, vsel);
|
2010-11-10 07:38:29 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return -EDOM;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
static int twl4030ldo_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
int vsel = twlreg_read(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER,
|
|
|
|
VREG_VOLTAGE);
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (vsel < 0)
|
|
|
|
return vsel;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vsel &= info->table_len - 1;
|
|
|
|
return LDO_MV(info->table[vsel]) * 1000;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
static struct regulator_ops twl4030ldo_ops = {
|
|
|
|
.list_voltage = twl4030ldo_list_voltage,
|
2009-02-26 12:50:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
.set_voltage = twl4030ldo_set_voltage,
|
|
|
|
.get_voltage = twl4030ldo_get_voltage,
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-20 07:33:51 -06:00
|
|
|
.enable = twl4030reg_enable,
|
2011-05-20 07:33:52 -06:00
|
|
|
.disable = twl4030reg_disable,
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
.is_enabled = twl4030reg_is_enabled,
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:46 -06:00
|
|
|
.set_mode = twl4030reg_set_mode,
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:45 -06:00
|
|
|
.get_status = twl4030reg_get_status,
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-28 07:53:19 -07:00
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
twl4030smps_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV, int max_uV,
|
|
|
|
unsigned *selector)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
int vsel = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_uV - 600000, 12500);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
twlreg_write(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_VOLTAGE_SMPS_4030,
|
|
|
|
vsel);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int twl4030smps_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
int vsel = twlreg_read(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER,
|
|
|
|
VREG_VOLTAGE_SMPS_4030);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return vsel * 12500 + 600000;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct regulator_ops twl4030smps_ops = {
|
|
|
|
.set_voltage = twl4030smps_set_voltage,
|
|
|
|
.get_voltage = twl4030smps_get_voltage,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
static int twl6030ldo_list_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned index)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ((info->min_mV + (index * 100)) * 1000);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int
|
2010-11-10 07:38:29 -07:00
|
|
|
twl6030ldo_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV, int max_uV,
|
|
|
|
unsigned *selector)
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
int vsel;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if ((min_uV/1000 < info->min_mV) || (max_uV/1000 > info->max_mV))
|
|
|
|
return -EDOM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Use the below formula to calculate vsel
|
|
|
|
* mV = 1000mv + 100mv * (vsel - 1)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
vsel = (min_uV/1000 - 1000)/100 + 1;
|
2010-11-10 07:38:29 -07:00
|
|
|
*selector = vsel;
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
return twlreg_write(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_VOLTAGE, vsel);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int twl6030ldo_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
int vsel = twlreg_read(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER,
|
|
|
|
VREG_VOLTAGE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (vsel < 0)
|
|
|
|
return vsel;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Use the below formula to calculate vsel
|
|
|
|
* mV = 1000mv + 100mv * (vsel - 1)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
return (1000 + (100 * (vsel - 1))) * 1000;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct regulator_ops twl6030ldo_ops = {
|
|
|
|
.list_voltage = twl6030ldo_list_voltage,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.set_voltage = twl6030ldo_set_voltage,
|
|
|
|
.get_voltage = twl6030ldo_get_voltage,
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-05-20 07:33:51 -06:00
|
|
|
.enable = twl6030reg_enable,
|
2011-05-20 07:33:52 -06:00
|
|
|
.disable = twl6030reg_disable,
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
.is_enabled = twl6030reg_is_enabled,
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:46 -06:00
|
|
|
.set_mode = twl6030reg_set_mode,
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:45 -06:00
|
|
|
.get_status = twl6030reg_get_status,
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Fixed voltage LDOs don't have a VSEL field to update.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
static int twlfixed_list_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned index)
|
2009-02-26 12:50:14 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return info->min_mV * 1000;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
static int twlfixed_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return info->min_mV * 1000;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
static struct regulator_ops twl4030fixed_ops = {
|
|
|
|
.list_voltage = twlfixed_list_voltage,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.get_voltage = twlfixed_get_voltage,
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-20 07:33:51 -06:00
|
|
|
.enable = twl4030reg_enable,
|
2011-05-20 07:33:52 -06:00
|
|
|
.disable = twl4030reg_disable,
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
.is_enabled = twl4030reg_is_enabled,
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:46 -06:00
|
|
|
.set_mode = twl4030reg_set_mode,
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:45 -06:00
|
|
|
.get_status = twl4030reg_get_status,
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct regulator_ops twl6030fixed_ops = {
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
.list_voltage = twlfixed_list_voltage,
|
2009-02-26 12:50:14 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
.get_voltage = twlfixed_get_voltage,
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-05-20 07:33:51 -06:00
|
|
|
.enable = twl6030reg_enable,
|
2011-05-20 07:33:52 -06:00
|
|
|
.disable = twl6030reg_disable,
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
.is_enabled = twl6030reg_is_enabled,
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:46 -06:00
|
|
|
.set_mode = twl6030reg_set_mode,
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:45 -06:00
|
|
|
.get_status = twl6030reg_get_status,
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-10 06:14:50 -07:00
|
|
|
static struct regulator_ops twl6030_fixed_resource = {
|
2011-05-20 07:33:51 -06:00
|
|
|
.enable = twl6030reg_enable,
|
2011-05-20 07:33:52 -06:00
|
|
|
.disable = twl6030reg_disable,
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
.is_enabled = twl6030reg_is_enabled,
|
2011-03-31 22:52:45 -06:00
|
|
|
.get_status = twl6030reg_get_status,
|
2011-02-10 06:14:50 -07:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* SMPS status and control
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int twl6030smps_list_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned index)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int voltage = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (info->flags) {
|
|
|
|
case SMPS_OFFSET_EN:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 100000;
|
|
|
|
/* fall through */
|
|
|
|
case 0:
|
|
|
|
switch (index) {
|
|
|
|
case 0:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 0;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 58:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 1350 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 59:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 1500 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 60:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 1800 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 61:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 1900 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 62:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 2100 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
voltage += (600000 + (12500 * (index - 1)));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case SMPS_EXTENDED_EN:
|
|
|
|
switch (index) {
|
|
|
|
case 0:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 0;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 58:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 2084 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 59:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 2315 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 60:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 2778 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 61:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 2932 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 62:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 3241 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
voltage = (1852000 + (38600 * (index - 1)));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case SMPS_OFFSET_EN | SMPS_EXTENDED_EN:
|
|
|
|
switch (index) {
|
|
|
|
case 0:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 0;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 58:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 4167 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 59:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 2315 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 60:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 2778 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 61:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 2932 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 62:
|
|
|
|
voltage = 3241 * 1000;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
voltage = (2161000 + (38600 * (index - 1)));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return voltage;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
twl6030smps_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV, int max_uV,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int *selector)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
int vsel = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (info->flags) {
|
|
|
|
case 0:
|
|
|
|
if (min_uV == 0)
|
|
|
|
vsel = 0;
|
|
|
|
else if ((min_uV >= 600000) && (max_uV <= 1300000)) {
|
|
|
|
vsel = (min_uV - 600000) / 125;
|
|
|
|
if (vsel % 100)
|
|
|
|
vsel += 100;
|
|
|
|
vsel /= 100;
|
|
|
|
vsel++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Values 1..57 for vsel are linear and can be calculated
|
|
|
|
* values 58..62 are non linear.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
else if ((min_uV > 1900000) && (max_uV >= 2100000))
|
|
|
|
vsel = 62;
|
|
|
|
else if ((min_uV > 1800000) && (max_uV >= 1900000))
|
|
|
|
vsel = 61;
|
|
|
|
else if ((min_uV > 1500000) && (max_uV >= 1800000))
|
|
|
|
vsel = 60;
|
|
|
|
else if ((min_uV > 1350000) && (max_uV >= 1500000))
|
|
|
|
vsel = 59;
|
|
|
|
else if ((min_uV > 1300000) && (max_uV >= 1350000))
|
|
|
|
vsel = 58;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case SMPS_OFFSET_EN:
|
|
|
|
if (min_uV == 0)
|
|
|
|
vsel = 0;
|
|
|
|
else if ((min_uV >= 700000) && (max_uV <= 1420000)) {
|
|
|
|
vsel = (min_uV - 700000) / 125;
|
|
|
|
if (vsel % 100)
|
|
|
|
vsel += 100;
|
|
|
|
vsel /= 100;
|
|
|
|
vsel++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Values 1..57 for vsel are linear and can be calculated
|
|
|
|
* values 58..62 are non linear.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
else if ((min_uV > 1900000) && (max_uV >= 2100000))
|
|
|
|
vsel = 62;
|
|
|
|
else if ((min_uV > 1800000) && (max_uV >= 1900000))
|
|
|
|
vsel = 61;
|
|
|
|
else if ((min_uV > 1350000) && (max_uV >= 1800000))
|
|
|
|
vsel = 60;
|
|
|
|
else if ((min_uV > 1350000) && (max_uV >= 1500000))
|
|
|
|
vsel = 59;
|
|
|
|
else if ((min_uV > 1300000) && (max_uV >= 1350000))
|
|
|
|
vsel = 58;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case SMPS_EXTENDED_EN:
|
|
|
|
if (min_uV == 0)
|
|
|
|
vsel = 0;
|
|
|
|
else if ((min_uV >= 1852000) && (max_uV <= 4013600)) {
|
|
|
|
vsel = (min_uV - 1852000) / 386;
|
|
|
|
if (vsel % 100)
|
|
|
|
vsel += 100;
|
|
|
|
vsel /= 100;
|
|
|
|
vsel++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case SMPS_OFFSET_EN|SMPS_EXTENDED_EN:
|
|
|
|
if (min_uV == 0)
|
|
|
|
vsel = 0;
|
|
|
|
else if ((min_uV >= 2161000) && (max_uV <= 4321000)) {
|
|
|
|
vsel = (min_uV - 1852000) / 386;
|
|
|
|
if (vsel % 100)
|
|
|
|
vsel += 100;
|
|
|
|
vsel /= 100;
|
|
|
|
vsel++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*selector = vsel;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return twlreg_write(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_VOLTAGE_SMPS,
|
|
|
|
vsel);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int twl6030smps_get_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return twlreg_read(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_VOLTAGE_SMPS);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct regulator_ops twlsmps_ops = {
|
|
|
|
.list_voltage = twl6030smps_list_voltage,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.set_voltage = twl6030smps_set_voltage,
|
|
|
|
.get_voltage_sel = twl6030smps_get_voltage_sel,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.enable = twl6030reg_enable,
|
|
|
|
.disable = twl6030reg_disable,
|
|
|
|
.is_enabled = twl6030reg_is_enabled,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.set_mode = twl6030reg_set_mode,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.get_status = twl6030reg_get_status,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-16 05:49:52 -07:00
|
|
|
#define TWL4030_FIXED_LDO(label, offset, mVolts, num, turnon_delay, \
|
|
|
|
remap_conf) \
|
|
|
|
TWL_FIXED_LDO(label, offset, mVolts, num, turnon_delay, \
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
remap_conf, TWL4030, twl4030fixed_ops)
|
2011-07-09 20:02:21 -06:00
|
|
|
#define TWL6030_FIXED_LDO(label, offset, mVolts, turnon_delay) \
|
|
|
|
TWL_FIXED_LDO(label, offset, mVolts, 0x0, turnon_delay, \
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
0x0, TWL6030, twl6030fixed_ops)
|
2009-12-16 05:49:52 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
#define TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(label, offset, num, turnon_delay, remap_conf) { \
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
.base = offset, \
|
|
|
|
.id = num, \
|
|
|
|
.table_len = ARRAY_SIZE(label##_VSEL_table), \
|
|
|
|
.table = label##_VSEL_table, \
|
2009-12-16 05:49:52 -07:00
|
|
|
.delay = turnon_delay, \
|
|
|
|
.remap = remap_conf, \
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
.desc = { \
|
|
|
|
.name = #label, \
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
.id = TWL4030_REG_##label, \
|
2009-02-26 12:50:14 -07:00
|
|
|
.n_voltages = ARRAY_SIZE(label##_VSEL_table), \
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
.ops = &twl4030ldo_ops, \
|
|
|
|
.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \
|
|
|
|
.owner = THIS_MODULE, \
|
|
|
|
}, \
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-28 07:53:19 -07:00
|
|
|
#define TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_SMPS(label, offset, num, turnon_delay, remap_conf) \
|
|
|
|
{ \
|
|
|
|
.base = offset, \
|
|
|
|
.id = num, \
|
|
|
|
.delay = turnon_delay, \
|
|
|
|
.remap = remap_conf, \
|
|
|
|
.desc = { \
|
|
|
|
.name = #label, \
|
|
|
|
.id = TWL4030_REG_##label, \
|
|
|
|
.ops = &twl4030smps_ops, \
|
|
|
|
.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \
|
|
|
|
.owner = THIS_MODULE, \
|
|
|
|
}, \
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-09 20:02:21 -06:00
|
|
|
#define TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(label, offset, min_mVolts, max_mVolts) { \
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
.base = offset, \
|
|
|
|
.min_mV = min_mVolts, \
|
|
|
|
.max_mV = max_mVolts, \
|
|
|
|
.desc = { \
|
|
|
|
.name = #label, \
|
|
|
|
.id = TWL6030_REG_##label, \
|
2011-05-27 13:25:27 -06:00
|
|
|
.n_voltages = (max_mVolts - min_mVolts)/100 + 1, \
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
.ops = &twl6030ldo_ops, \
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \
|
|
|
|
.owner = THIS_MODULE, \
|
|
|
|
}, \
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-09 20:02:21 -06:00
|
|
|
#define TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(label, offset, min_mVolts, max_mVolts) { \
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
.base = offset, \
|
|
|
|
.min_mV = min_mVolts, \
|
|
|
|
.max_mV = max_mVolts, \
|
|
|
|
.desc = { \
|
|
|
|
.name = #label, \
|
|
|
|
.id = TWL6025_REG_##label, \
|
|
|
|
.n_voltages = ((max_mVolts - min_mVolts)/100) + 1, \
|
|
|
|
.ops = &twl6030ldo_ops, \
|
|
|
|
.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \
|
|
|
|
.owner = THIS_MODULE, \
|
|
|
|
}, \
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-04-22 02:48:32 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-16 05:49:52 -07:00
|
|
|
#define TWL_FIXED_LDO(label, offset, mVolts, num, turnon_delay, remap_conf, \
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
family, operations) { \
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
.base = offset, \
|
|
|
|
.id = num, \
|
|
|
|
.min_mV = mVolts, \
|
2009-12-16 05:49:52 -07:00
|
|
|
.delay = turnon_delay, \
|
|
|
|
.remap = remap_conf, \
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
.desc = { \
|
|
|
|
.name = #label, \
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
.id = family##_REG_##label, \
|
2009-02-26 12:50:14 -07:00
|
|
|
.n_voltages = 1, \
|
2011-03-31 22:52:44 -06:00
|
|
|
.ops = &operations, \
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \
|
|
|
|
.owner = THIS_MODULE, \
|
|
|
|
}, \
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-09 20:02:21 -06:00
|
|
|
#define TWL6030_FIXED_RESOURCE(label, offset, turnon_delay) { \
|
2011-02-10 06:14:50 -07:00
|
|
|
.base = offset, \
|
|
|
|
.delay = turnon_delay, \
|
|
|
|
.desc = { \
|
|
|
|
.name = #label, \
|
|
|
|
.id = TWL6030_REG_##label, \
|
|
|
|
.ops = &twl6030_fixed_resource, \
|
|
|
|
.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \
|
|
|
|
.owner = THIS_MODULE, \
|
|
|
|
}, \
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-07-09 20:02:21 -06:00
|
|
|
#define TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_SMPS(label, offset) { \
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
.base = offset, \
|
|
|
|
.min_mV = 600, \
|
|
|
|
.max_mV = 2100, \
|
|
|
|
.desc = { \
|
|
|
|
.name = #label, \
|
|
|
|
.id = TWL6025_REG_##label, \
|
|
|
|
.n_voltages = 63, \
|
|
|
|
.ops = &twlsmps_ops, \
|
|
|
|
.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \
|
|
|
|
.owner = THIS_MODULE, \
|
|
|
|
}, \
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We list regulators here if systems need some level of
|
|
|
|
* software control over them after boot.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
static struct twlreg_info twl_regs[] = {
|
2009-12-16 05:49:52 -07:00
|
|
|
TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VAUX1, 0x17, 1, 100, 0x08),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VAUX2_4030, 0x1b, 2, 100, 0x08),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VAUX2, 0x1b, 2, 100, 0x08),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VAUX3, 0x1f, 3, 100, 0x08),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VAUX4, 0x23, 4, 100, 0x08),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VMMC1, 0x27, 5, 100, 0x08),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VMMC2, 0x2b, 6, 100, 0x08),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VPLL1, 0x2f, 7, 100, 0x00),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VPLL2, 0x33, 8, 100, 0x08),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VSIM, 0x37, 9, 100, 0x00),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VDAC, 0x3b, 10, 100, 0x08),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_FIXED_LDO(VINTANA1, 0x3f, 1500, 11, 100, 0x08),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VINTANA2, 0x43, 12, 100, 0x08),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_FIXED_LDO(VINTDIG, 0x47, 1500, 13, 100, 0x08),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VIO, 0x4b, 14, 1000, 0x08),
|
2011-11-28 07:53:19 -07:00
|
|
|
TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_SMPS(VDD1, 0x55, 15, 1000, 0x08),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_ADJUSTABLE_SMPS(VDD2, 0x63, 16, 1000, 0x08),
|
2009-12-16 05:49:52 -07:00
|
|
|
TWL4030_FIXED_LDO(VUSB1V5, 0x71, 1500, 17, 100, 0x08),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_FIXED_LDO(VUSB1V8, 0x74, 1800, 18, 100, 0x08),
|
|
|
|
TWL4030_FIXED_LDO(VUSB3V1, 0x77, 3100, 19, 150, 0x08),
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
/* VUSBCP is managed *only* by the USB subchip */
|
2009-12-13 14:19:23 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* 6030 REG with base as PMC Slave Misc : 0x0030 */
|
2009-12-16 05:49:52 -07:00
|
|
|
/* Turnon-delay and remap configuration values for 6030 are not
|
|
|
|
verified since the specification is not public */
|
2011-07-09 20:02:21 -06:00
|
|
|
TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VAUX1_6030, 0x54, 1000, 3300),
|
|
|
|
TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VAUX2_6030, 0x58, 1000, 3300),
|
|
|
|
TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VAUX3_6030, 0x5c, 1000, 3300),
|
|
|
|
TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VMMC, 0x68, 1000, 3300),
|
|
|
|
TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VPP, 0x6c, 1000, 3300),
|
|
|
|
TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(VUSIM, 0x74, 1000, 3300),
|
|
|
|
TWL6030_FIXED_LDO(VANA, 0x50, 2100, 0),
|
|
|
|
TWL6030_FIXED_LDO(VCXIO, 0x60, 1800, 0),
|
|
|
|
TWL6030_FIXED_LDO(VDAC, 0x64, 1800, 0),
|
|
|
|
TWL6030_FIXED_LDO(VUSB, 0x70, 3300, 0),
|
|
|
|
TWL6030_FIXED_RESOURCE(CLK32KG, 0x8C, 0),
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* 6025 are renamed compared to 6030 versions */
|
2011-07-09 20:02:21 -06:00
|
|
|
TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO2, 0x54, 1000, 3300),
|
|
|
|
TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO4, 0x58, 1000, 3300),
|
|
|
|
TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO3, 0x5c, 1000, 3300),
|
|
|
|
TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO5, 0x68, 1000, 3300),
|
|
|
|
TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO1, 0x6c, 1000, 3300),
|
|
|
|
TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO7, 0x74, 1000, 3300),
|
|
|
|
TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDO6, 0x60, 1000, 3300),
|
|
|
|
TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDOLN, 0x64, 1000, 3300),
|
|
|
|
TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_LDO(LDOUSB, 0x70, 1000, 3300),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_SMPS(SMPS3, 0x34),
|
|
|
|
TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_SMPS(SMPS4, 0x10),
|
|
|
|
TWL6025_ADJUSTABLE_SMPS(VIO, 0x16),
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
static u8 twl_get_smps_offset(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u8 value;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, &value,
|
|
|
|
TWL6030_SMPS_OFFSET);
|
|
|
|
return value;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static u8 twl_get_smps_mult(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
u8 value;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, &value,
|
|
|
|
TWL6030_SMPS_MULT);
|
|
|
|
return value;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-24 00:38:01 -07:00
|
|
|
static int __devinit twlreg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
struct twlreg_info *info;
|
|
|
|
struct regulator_init_data *initdata;
|
|
|
|
struct regulation_constraints *c;
|
|
|
|
struct regulator_dev *rdev;
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0, info = NULL; i < ARRAY_SIZE(twl_regs); i++) {
|
|
|
|
if (twl_regs[i].desc.id != pdev->id)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
continue;
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
info = twl_regs + i;
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!info)
|
|
|
|
return -ENODEV;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
initdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
|
|
|
|
if (!initdata)
|
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
/* copy the features into regulator data */
|
|
|
|
info->features = (unsigned long)initdata->driver_data;
|
|
|
|
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
/* Constrain board-specific capabilities according to what
|
|
|
|
* this driver and the chip itself can actually do.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
c = &initdata->constraints;
|
|
|
|
c->valid_modes_mask &= REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL | REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY;
|
|
|
|
c->valid_ops_mask &= REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE
|
|
|
|
| REGULATOR_CHANGE_MODE
|
|
|
|
| REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS;
|
2009-12-16 06:27:56 -07:00
|
|
|
switch (pdev->id) {
|
|
|
|
case TWL4030_REG_VIO:
|
|
|
|
case TWL4030_REG_VDD1:
|
|
|
|
case TWL4030_REG_VDD2:
|
|
|
|
case TWL4030_REG_VPLL1:
|
|
|
|
case TWL4030_REG_VINTANA1:
|
|
|
|
case TWL4030_REG_VINTANA2:
|
|
|
|
case TWL4030_REG_VINTDIG:
|
|
|
|
c->always_on = true;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2011-05-22 14:21:23 -06:00
|
|
|
switch (pdev->id) {
|
|
|
|
case TWL6025_REG_SMPS3:
|
|
|
|
if (twl_get_smps_mult() & SMPS_MULTOFFSET_SMPS3)
|
|
|
|
info->flags |= SMPS_EXTENDED_EN;
|
|
|
|
if (twl_get_smps_offset() & SMPS_MULTOFFSET_SMPS3)
|
|
|
|
info->flags |= SMPS_OFFSET_EN;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case TWL6025_REG_SMPS4:
|
|
|
|
if (twl_get_smps_mult() & SMPS_MULTOFFSET_SMPS4)
|
|
|
|
info->flags |= SMPS_EXTENDED_EN;
|
|
|
|
if (twl_get_smps_offset() & SMPS_MULTOFFSET_SMPS4)
|
|
|
|
info->flags |= SMPS_OFFSET_EN;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case TWL6025_REG_VIO:
|
|
|
|
if (twl_get_smps_mult() & SMPS_MULTOFFSET_VIO)
|
|
|
|
info->flags |= SMPS_EXTENDED_EN;
|
|
|
|
if (twl_get_smps_offset() & SMPS_MULTOFFSET_VIO)
|
|
|
|
info->flags |= SMPS_OFFSET_EN;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-11-18 04:17:19 -07:00
|
|
|
rdev = regulator_register(&info->desc, &pdev->dev, initdata, info, NULL);
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
|
|
|
|
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't register %s, %ld\n",
|
|
|
|
info->desc.name, PTR_ERR(rdev));
|
|
|
|
return PTR_ERR(rdev);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rdev);
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-31 22:52:43 -06:00
|
|
|
if (twl_class_is_4030())
|
|
|
|
twlreg_write(info, TWL_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, VREG_REMAP,
|
2009-12-16 06:27:58 -07:00
|
|
|
info->remap);
|
|
|
|
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
/* NOTE: many regulators support short-circuit IRQs (presentable
|
|
|
|
* as REGULATOR_OVER_CURRENT notifications?) configured via:
|
|
|
|
* - SC_CONFIG
|
|
|
|
* - SC_DETECT1 (vintana2, vmmc1/2, vaux1/2/3/4)
|
|
|
|
* - SC_DETECT2 (vusb, vdac, vio, vdd1/2, vpll2)
|
|
|
|
* - IT_CONFIG
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
static int __devexit twlreg_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
regulator_unregister(platform_get_drvdata(pdev));
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
MODULE_ALIAS("platform:twl_reg");
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
static struct platform_driver twlreg_driver = {
|
|
|
|
.probe = twlreg_probe,
|
|
|
|
.remove = __devexit_p(twlreg_remove),
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
/* NOTE: short name, to work around driver model truncation of
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
* "twl_regulator.12" (and friends) to "twl_regulator.1".
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
.driver.name = "twl_reg",
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
.driver.owner = THIS_MODULE,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
static int __init twlreg_init(void)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
return platform_driver_register(&twlreg_driver);
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
subsys_initcall(twlreg_init);
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
static void __exit twlreg_exit(void)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
platform_driver_unregister(&twlreg_driver);
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
module_exit(twlreg_exit)
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2009-12-13 13:36:49 -07:00
|
|
|
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TWL regulator driver");
|
regulator: twl4030 regulators
Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
voltage rail is not needed.
The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to
be safe, they won't be exported here.
These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
inputs not exposed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
2009-02-08 11:37:06 -07:00
|
|
|
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
|