kernel-fxtec-pro1x/lib/find_bit.c

209 lines
5 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/* bit search implementation
*
* Copyright (C) 2004 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
* Written by David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com)
*
* Copyright (C) 2008 IBM Corporation
* 'find_last_bit' is written by Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
* (Inspired by David Howell's find_next_bit implementation)
*
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
* Rewritten by Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> to decrease
* size and improve performance, 2015.
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*/
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/bitmap.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
#include <linux/kernel.h>
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and() We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and(). It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs, lookup the rhs to see if it's set there). Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit` module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below). For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3]. [1] Approximate benchmark code: ``` unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1}; unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2}; for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) { for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) { asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p)); unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p); asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result)); } } ``` Results: pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after 0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65 0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24 0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94 0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0 0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67 0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71 0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90 0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58 0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46 0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49 0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45 0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10 0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18 0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18 0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17 0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25 ----------------------------- geo.mean 2.06 [2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake) [ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations [ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations [ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations [ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations [3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3). [ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations [ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations [ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations [ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations [courbet@google.com: v6] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com [geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 16:38:34 -07:00
#if !defined(find_next_bit) || !defined(find_next_zero_bit) || \
!defined(find_next_and_bit)
/*
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and() We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and(). It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs, lookup the rhs to see if it's set there). Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit` module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below). For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3]. [1] Approximate benchmark code: ``` unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1}; unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2}; for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) { for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) { asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p)); unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p); asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result)); } } ``` Results: pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after 0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65 0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24 0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94 0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0 0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67 0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71 0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90 0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58 0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46 0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49 0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45 0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10 0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18 0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18 0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17 0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25 ----------------------------- geo.mean 2.06 [2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake) [ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations [ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations [ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations [ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations [3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3). [ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations [ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations [ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations [ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations [courbet@google.com: v6] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com [geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 16:38:34 -07:00
* This is a common helper function for find_next_bit, find_next_zero_bit, and
* find_next_and_bit. The differences are:
* - The "invert" argument, which is XORed with each fetched word before
* searching it for one bits.
* - The optional "addr2", which is anded with "addr1" if present.
*/
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and() We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and(). It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs, lookup the rhs to see if it's set there). Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit` module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below). For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3]. [1] Approximate benchmark code: ``` unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1}; unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2}; for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) { for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) { asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p)); unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p); asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result)); } } ``` Results: pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after 0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65 0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24 0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94 0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0 0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67 0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71 0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90 0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58 0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46 0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49 0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45 0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10 0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18 0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18 0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17 0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25 ----------------------------- geo.mean 2.06 [2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake) [ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations [ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations [ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations [ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations [3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3). [ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations [ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations [ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations [ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations [courbet@google.com: v6] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com [geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 16:38:34 -07:00
static inline unsigned long _find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr1,
const unsigned long *addr2, unsigned long nbits,
unsigned long start, unsigned long invert)
{
unsigned long tmp;
if (unlikely(start >= nbits))
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
return nbits;
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and() We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and(). It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs, lookup the rhs to see if it's set there). Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit` module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below). For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3]. [1] Approximate benchmark code: ``` unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1}; unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2}; for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) { for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) { asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p)); unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p); asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result)); } } ``` Results: pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after 0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65 0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24 0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94 0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0 0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67 0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71 0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90 0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58 0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46 0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49 0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45 0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10 0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18 0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18 0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17 0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25 ----------------------------- geo.mean 2.06 [2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake) [ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations [ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations [ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations [ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations [3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3). [ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations [ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations [ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations [ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations [courbet@google.com: v6] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com [geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 16:38:34 -07:00
tmp = addr1[start / BITS_PER_LONG];
if (addr2)
tmp &= addr2[start / BITS_PER_LONG];
tmp ^= invert;
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
/* Handle 1st word. */
tmp &= BITMAP_FIRST_WORD_MASK(start);
start = round_down(start, BITS_PER_LONG);
while (!tmp) {
start += BITS_PER_LONG;
if (start >= nbits)
return nbits;
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and() We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and(). It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs, lookup the rhs to see if it's set there). Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit` module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below). For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3]. [1] Approximate benchmark code: ``` unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1}; unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2}; for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) { for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) { asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p)); unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p); asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result)); } } ``` Results: pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after 0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65 0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24 0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94 0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0 0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67 0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71 0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90 0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58 0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46 0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49 0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45 0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10 0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18 0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18 0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17 0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25 ----------------------------- geo.mean 2.06 [2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake) [ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations [ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations [ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations [ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations [3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3). [ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations [ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations [ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations [ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations [courbet@google.com: v6] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com [geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 16:38:34 -07:00
tmp = addr1[start / BITS_PER_LONG];
if (addr2)
tmp &= addr2[start / BITS_PER_LONG];
tmp ^= invert;
}
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
return min(start + __ffs(tmp), nbits);
}
#endif
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
#ifndef find_next_bit
/*
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
* Find the next set bit in a memory region.
*/
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
unsigned long find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size,
unsigned long offset)
{
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and() We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and(). It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs, lookup the rhs to see if it's set there). Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit` module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below). For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3]. [1] Approximate benchmark code: ``` unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1}; unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2}; for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) { for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) { asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p)); unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p); asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result)); } } ``` Results: pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after 0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65 0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24 0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94 0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0 0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67 0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71 0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90 0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58 0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46 0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49 0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45 0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10 0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18 0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18 0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17 0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25 ----------------------------- geo.mean 2.06 [2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake) [ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations [ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations [ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations [ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations [3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3). [ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations [ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations [ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations [ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations [courbet@google.com: v6] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com [geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 16:38:34 -07:00
return _find_next_bit(addr, NULL, size, offset, 0UL);
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_next_bit);
#endif
#ifndef find_next_zero_bit
unsigned long find_next_zero_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size,
unsigned long offset)
{
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and() We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and(). It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs, lookup the rhs to see if it's set there). Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit` module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below). For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3]. [1] Approximate benchmark code: ``` unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1}; unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2}; for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) { for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) { asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p)); unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p); asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result)); } } ``` Results: pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after 0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65 0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24 0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94 0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0 0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67 0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71 0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90 0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58 0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46 0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49 0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45 0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10 0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18 0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18 0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17 0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25 ----------------------------- geo.mean 2.06 [2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake) [ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations [ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations [ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations [ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations [3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3). [ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations [ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations [ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations [ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations [courbet@google.com: v6] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com [geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 16:38:34 -07:00
return _find_next_bit(addr, NULL, size, offset, ~0UL);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_next_zero_bit);
#endif
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and() We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and(). It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs, lookup the rhs to see if it's set there). Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit` module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below). For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3]. [1] Approximate benchmark code: ``` unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1}; unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2}; for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) { for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) { asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p)); unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p); asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result)); } } ``` Results: pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after 0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65 0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24 0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94 0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0 0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67 0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71 0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90 0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58 0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46 0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49 0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45 0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10 0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18 0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18 0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17 0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25 ----------------------------- geo.mean 2.06 [2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake) [ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations [ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations [ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations [ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations [3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3). [ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations [ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations [ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations [ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations [courbet@google.com: v6] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com [geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 16:38:34 -07:00
#if !defined(find_next_and_bit)
unsigned long find_next_and_bit(const unsigned long *addr1,
const unsigned long *addr2, unsigned long size,
unsigned long offset)
{
return _find_next_bit(addr1, addr2, size, offset, 0UL);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_next_and_bit);
#endif
#ifndef find_first_bit
/*
* Find the first set bit in a memory region.
*/
unsigned long find_first_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size)
{
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
unsigned long idx;
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
for (idx = 0; idx * BITS_PER_LONG < size; idx++) {
if (addr[idx])
return min(idx * BITS_PER_LONG + __ffs(addr[idx]), size);
}
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
return size;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_first_bit);
#endif
#ifndef find_first_zero_bit
/*
* Find the first cleared bit in a memory region.
*/
unsigned long find_first_zero_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size)
{
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
unsigned long idx;
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
for (idx = 0; idx * BITS_PER_LONG < size; idx++) {
if (addr[idx] != ~0UL)
return min(idx * BITS_PER_LONG + ffz(addr[idx]), size);
}
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
return size;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_first_zero_bit);
#endif
#ifndef find_last_bit
unsigned long find_last_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size)
{
if (size) {
unsigned long val = BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(size);
unsigned long idx = (size-1) / BITS_PER_LONG;
do {
val &= addr[idx];
if (val)
return idx * BITS_PER_LONG + __fls(val);
val = ~0ul;
} while (idx--);
}
return size;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_last_bit);
#endif
#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
#if !defined(find_next_bit_le) || !defined(find_next_zero_bit_le)
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and() We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and(). It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs, lookup the rhs to see if it's set there). Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit` module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below). For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3]. [1] Approximate benchmark code: ``` unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1}; unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2}; for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) { for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) { asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p)); unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p); asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result)); } } ``` Results: pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after 0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65 0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24 0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94 0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0 0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67 0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71 0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90 0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58 0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46 0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49 0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45 0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10 0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18 0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18 0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17 0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25 ----------------------------- geo.mean 2.06 [2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake) [ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations [ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations [ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations [ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations [3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3). [ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations [ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations [ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations [ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations [courbet@google.com: v6] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com [geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 16:38:34 -07:00
static inline unsigned long _find_next_bit_le(const unsigned long *addr1,
const unsigned long *addr2, unsigned long nbits,
unsigned long start, unsigned long invert)
{
unsigned long tmp;
if (unlikely(start >= nbits))
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
return nbits;
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and() We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and(). It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs, lookup the rhs to see if it's set there). Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit` module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below). For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3]. [1] Approximate benchmark code: ``` unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1}; unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2}; for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) { for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) { asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p)); unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p); asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result)); } } ``` Results: pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after 0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65 0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24 0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94 0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0 0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67 0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71 0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90 0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58 0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46 0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49 0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45 0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10 0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18 0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18 0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17 0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25 ----------------------------- geo.mean 2.06 [2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake) [ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations [ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations [ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations [ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations [3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3). [ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations [ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations [ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations [ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations [courbet@google.com: v6] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com [geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 16:38:34 -07:00
tmp = addr1[start / BITS_PER_LONG];
if (addr2)
tmp &= addr2[start / BITS_PER_LONG];
tmp ^= invert;
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
/* Handle 1st word. */
tmp &= swab(BITMAP_FIRST_WORD_MASK(start));
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
start = round_down(start, BITS_PER_LONG);
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
while (!tmp) {
start += BITS_PER_LONG;
if (start >= nbits)
return nbits;
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and() We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and(). It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs, lookup the rhs to see if it's set there). Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit` module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below). For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3]. [1] Approximate benchmark code: ``` unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1}; unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2}; for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) { for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) { asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p)); unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p); asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result)); } } ``` Results: pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after 0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65 0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24 0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94 0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0 0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67 0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71 0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90 0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58 0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46 0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49 0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45 0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10 0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18 0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18 0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17 0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25 ----------------------------- geo.mean 2.06 [2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake) [ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations [ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations [ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations [ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations [3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3). [ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations [ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations [ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations [ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations [courbet@google.com: v6] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com [geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 16:38:34 -07:00
tmp = addr1[start / BITS_PER_LONG];
if (addr2)
tmp &= addr2[start / BITS_PER_LONG];
tmp ^= invert;
}
return min(start + __ffs(swab(tmp)), nbits);
lib: find_*_bit reimplementation This patchset does rework to find_bit function family to achieve better performance, and decrease size of text. All rework is done in patch 1. Patches 2 and 3 are about code moving and renaming. It was boot-tested on x86_64 and MIPS (big-endian) machines. Performance tests were ran on userspace with code like this: /* addr[] is filled from /dev/urandom */ start = clock(); while (ret < nbits) ret = find_next_bit(addr, nbits, ret + 1); end = clock(); printf("%ld\t", (unsigned long) end - start); On Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz measurements are: (for find_next_bit, nbits is 8M, for find_first_bit - 80K) find_next_bit: find_first_bit: new current new current 26932 43151 14777 14925 26947 43182 14521 15423 26507 43824 15053 14705 27329 43759 14473 14777 26895 43367 14847 15023 26990 43693 15103 15163 26775 43299 15067 15232 27282 42752 14544 15121 27504 43088 14644 14858 26761 43856 14699 15193 26692 43075 14781 14681 27137 42969 14451 15061 ... ... find_next_bit performance gain is 35-40%; find_first_bit - no measurable difference. On ARM machine, there is arch-specific implementation for find_bit. Thanks a lot to George Spelvin and Rasmus Villemoes for hints and helpful discussions. This patch (of 3): New implementations takes less space in source file (see diffstat) and in object. For me it's 710 vs 453 bytes of text. It also shows better performance. find_last_bit description fixed due to obvious typo. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: include linux/bitmap.h, per Rasmus] Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com> Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-04-16 13:43:13 -06:00
}
#endif
#ifndef find_next_zero_bit_le
unsigned long find_next_zero_bit_le(const void *addr, unsigned
long size, unsigned long offset)
{
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and() We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and(). It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs, lookup the rhs to see if it's set there). Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit` module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below). For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3]. [1] Approximate benchmark code: ``` unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1}; unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2}; for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) { for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) { asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p)); unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p); asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result)); } } ``` Results: pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after 0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65 0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24 0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94 0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0 0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67 0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71 0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90 0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58 0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46 0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49 0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45 0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10 0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18 0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18 0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17 0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25 ----------------------------- geo.mean 2.06 [2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake) [ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations [ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations [ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations [ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations [3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3). [ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations [ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations [ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations [ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations [courbet@google.com: v6] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com [geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 16:38:34 -07:00
return _find_next_bit_le(addr, NULL, size, offset, ~0UL);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_next_zero_bit_le);
#endif
#ifndef find_next_bit_le
2011-03-23 17:41:50 -06:00
unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr, unsigned
long size, unsigned long offset)
{
lib: optimize cpumask_next_and() We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and(). It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs, lookup the rhs to see if it's set there). Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built join). Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit` module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below). For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1]. No impact on memory usage. Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3]. [1] Approximate benchmark code: ``` unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1}; unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2}; for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) { for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) { asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p)); unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p); asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result)); } } ``` Results: pattern1 pattern2 time_before/time_after 0x0000ffff 0x0000ffff 1.65 0x0000ffff 0x00005555 2.24 0x0000ffff 0x00001111 2.94 0x0000ffff 0x00000000 14.0 0x00005555 0x0000ffff 1.67 0x00005555 0x00005555 1.71 0x00005555 0x00001111 1.90 0x00005555 0x00000000 6.58 0x00001111 0x0000ffff 1.46 0x00001111 0x00005555 1.49 0x00001111 0x00001111 1.45 0x00001111 0x00000000 3.10 0x00000000 0x0000ffff 1.18 0x00000000 0x00005555 1.18 0x00000000 0x00001111 1.17 0x00000000 0x00000000 1.25 ----------------------------- geo.mean 2.06 [2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake) [ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations [ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations [ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations [ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations [ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations [ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations [3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3). [ 267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations [ 267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations [ 267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations [ 267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled bitmap [ 267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations [ 267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations [ 267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations [ 267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap [ 267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations [courbet@google.com: v6] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com [geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.com Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-02-06 16:38:34 -07:00
return _find_next_bit_le(addr, NULL, size, offset, 0UL);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_next_bit_le);
#endif
#endif /* __BIG_ENDIAN */