2009-09-16 00:54:45 -06:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Only give sleepers 50% of their service deficit. This allows
|
|
|
|
* them to run sooner, but does not allow tons of sleepers to
|
|
|
|
* rip the spread apart.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS, 1)
|
2009-09-11 04:31:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Place new tasks ahead so that they do not starve already running
|
|
|
|
* tasks
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-04-19 11:45:00 -06:00
|
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(START_DEBIT, 1)
|
2009-09-11 04:31:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Should wakeups try to preempt running tasks.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(WAKEUP_PREEMPT, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Based on load and program behaviour, see if it makes sense to place
|
|
|
|
* a newly woken task on the same cpu as the task that woke it --
|
|
|
|
* improve cache locality. Typically used with SYNC wakeups as
|
|
|
|
* generated by pipes and the like, see also SYNC_WAKEUPS.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-04-19 11:45:00 -06:00
|
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(AFFINE_WAKEUPS, 1)
|
2009-09-11 04:31:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Prefer to schedule the task we woke last (assuming it failed
|
|
|
|
* wakeup-preemption), since its likely going to consume data we
|
|
|
|
* touched, increases cache locality.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
sched: Improve latencies and throughput
Make the idle balancer more agressive, to improve a
x264 encoding workload provided by Jason Garrett-Glaser:
NEXT_BUDDY NO_LB_BIAS
encoded 600 frames, 252.82 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
encoded 600 frames, 250.69 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
encoded 600 frames, 245.76 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
NO_NEXT_BUDDY LB_BIAS
encoded 600 frames, 344.44 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
encoded 600 frames, 346.66 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
encoded 600 frames, 352.59 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
NO_NEXT_BUDDY NO_LB_BIAS
encoded 600 frames, 425.75 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
encoded 600 frames, 425.45 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
encoded 600 frames, 422.49 fps, 22096.60 kb/s
Peter pointed out that this is better done via newidle_idx,
not via LB_BIAS, newidle balancing should look for where
there is load _now_, not where there was load 2 ticks ago.
Worst-case latencies are improved as well as no buddies
means less vruntime spread. (as per prior lkml discussions)
This change improves kbuild-peak parallelism as well.
Reported-by: Jason Garrett-Glaser <darkshikari@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1253011667.9128.16.camel@marge.simson.net>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2009-09-15 07:07:03 -06:00
|
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(NEXT_BUDDY, 0)
|
2009-09-11 04:31:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Prefer to schedule the task that ran last (when we did
|
|
|
|
* wake-preempt) as that likely will touch the same data, increases
|
|
|
|
* cache locality.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(LAST_BUDDY, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Consider buddies to be cache hot, decreases the likelyness of a
|
|
|
|
* cache buddy being migrated away, increases cache locality.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-04-19 11:45:00 -06:00
|
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(CACHE_HOT_BUDDY, 1)
|
2009-09-11 04:31:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
2009-09-03 05:20:03 -06:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Use arch dependent cpu power functions
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(ARCH_POWER, 0)
|
|
|
|
|
2008-10-20 06:27:43 -06:00
|
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(HRTICK, 0)
|
2008-04-19 11:45:00 -06:00
|
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(DOUBLE_TICK, 0)
|
2008-08-20 04:44:55 -06:00
|
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(LB_BIAS, 1)
|
2009-09-16 05:44:33 -06:00
|
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(LB_SHARES_UPDATE, 1)
|
2008-06-27 05:41:39 -06:00
|
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(ASYM_EFF_LOAD, 1)
|
2009-09-11 04:31:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Spin-wait on mutex acquisition when the mutex owner is running on
|
|
|
|
* another cpu -- assumes that when the owner is running, it will soon
|
|
|
|
* release the lock. Decreases scheduling overhead.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2009-01-12 06:01:47 -07:00
|
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(OWNER_SPIN, 1)
|